Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... Hans are you saying that Todd may say whatever he wants whenever where he wants however he wants on the ham bands? No, Dee, I didn't say that (and of course you know that I didn't). The hams bands aren't a right, but a regulated privilege. Do you believe then that Part 97 is unconstitutional when it prohibits commericial use and foul language? No, I don't believe that (and of course you know that I don't). The amateur bands aren't a right but a regulated privilege. I do believe, however, that Todd has protections in the Constitution which allow him to raise those issues here on rrap, just as Steve has protections for his assertions that parts of the Constitution are not appropriate to his political views. While I'm disgusted by Todds trashy language here, I am more disgusted by the overt actions to deny him his Constitutional protections. 73, de Hans, K0HB The ability to express ideas is indeed protected (unless of course one is advocating the VIOLENT overthrow of the government). However those ideas can be expressed in trashy language or they can be expressed in non-trashy language. I see no violation of freedom of speech in requiring the use of non-trashy language in public forums. Internet news groups, since they are open to all, would be a public forum. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which Todd Do We Believe...??? | Policy | |||
K4YZ ANSWER MY QUESTION | Policy | |||
Boy broadcaster N9OGL - Part One | Policy | |||
Todd Faking "Responses" to Posts On His Blog | Policy | |||
Boy Broadcaster N9OGL - Part II | Policy |