| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#51
November 10th 05, 02:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: Steve Robeson May 30 2000, 2:00 am hide options Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson) - Find messages by this author Date: 2000/05/30 Subject: Kim's Callsign Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse Subject: Kim's Callsign From: (T.L. Bryant) Date: 05/29/2000 8:07 PM Central Daylight Time Thank you, Sigmund. Now, if our inadequacies offend you so much, please turn your radio off, or change the frequency to something that isn't so inadequate for you. Ooooooohhhhhh! We hit a bit close to HOME, did we, Tom? I didn't say ANYTHING about being inadeqaute for ME. I placed that onus upon those who find it necessary to resort to "shock-jock" antics and callsigns. Take an Ativan, Tom. That's my professional suggestion. Steve The nation that is ready to fight in peacetime is less likely to HAVE to fight in wartime......(Author unknown, but he probably wasn't a politician!) Hmmm? Is Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN prescribing meds? so it would seem med by name in his professional opinion like you said Google provide You're welcome to try and document this as an attempt to "prescribe". I'll offer the BopN my congratualtions on reserving thier laughter now..... Steve, K4YZ "their" Steve, when I put forth my opinion that you were nuts, you jumped up and down asking where my medical degree came from, screaming and crying like a little baby that I had made a medical diagnosis. But here you are clearly prescribing a medication by name to a person by name, and following it up with the statement that it's your professional opinion. When you step outside your medical authority and prescribe medication to someone that you've never met or examined, you jump up and down and scream and cry that you aren't making a medical diagnosis. You're such a two-faced little skunk. Best of Luck with the board. Five minutes on Google provides. Here's two such incidents. There are more. Steve tried to use his professional license to: 1. diagnose a mental illness over the internet, and 2. get someone in another state committed with a simple phone call. _________________________________ Quote 348. Steve Robeson K4CAP Mar 25 2004, 9:17 am hide options Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) - Find messages by this author Date: 25 Mar 2004 14:17:01 GMT Local: Thurs, Mar 25 2004 9:17 am Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service From: (William) Date: 3/24/2004 6:08 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service From: (William) Date: 3/19/2004 6:16 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I know only one Steve Roberson and he's nuts. Well..."Steve Roberson" MAY be nuts. I am not. YOU, on the other hand, are not truthful. Steve, K4YZ I stand corrected. Steve Robeson is nuts. You've made another assertion of fact, Brain. That assertion would be, in most cases, the rendering of a diagnosis, which requires a degree as a medical doctor. Are you now telling us that you are a medical doctor? Please cite what criteria you base this diagnosis on? That I have labled you a liar after having presented you with your own words only to have you try and deny it...?!?! Or that I have labeled you a liar becasue you've made OTHER assertions of fact for which you refuse to corroborate with some reasonably valid documentation? Steve, K4YZ End Quote _________________________________ Quote 160. Steve Robeson, K4CAP Jun 28 2004, 1:58 am hide options Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) - Find messages by this author Date: 27 Jun 2004 23:58:14 -0700 Local: Mon, Jun 28 2004 1:58 am Subject: Temper Fry, Was Able Baker Charlie Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse (William) wrote in message . com... He yell and yell, he hate me and hate me. Now he say he spect better from me. Maybe trap or lie. I no trust. He noisy. He yell and yell. Why he want military gear? I 'member. He say he militia. Why he fixated with boys? He need get help. Take somekinda sumptin. No badge as boy. Must compensate now. I re-extend my offer to use my professional contacts to help you, Brain. It always looks better on your record to appear as having been aware you ahve a problem and taking steps to fix it, than to be involuntarilly commited in order to force the issue. I can make that happen for you, Brain. Shall I make the call....?!?!? Steve, K4YZ End Quote ------------------------------------------------ |
|
#52
November 10th 05, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
|
|
#53
November 10th 05, 11:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
More Markie Mularkie
|
|
#54
November 10th 05, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: cut nor do I feel there is anything to correct There was, but you didn't notice. nothing to correct it was and remains a fact that Stevie appreas to be abusing the preveldges of his LPN license, that exact dtails are unimportant HERE They're unimportant ANYwhere, Markie. then you are lying in claiming any harm can come to me in report ing you if you can not be damaged by what I do you are not harmed by it, if you are not harmed no civil case, try a basic study guide to law Try as you will, there's not one thing in this NG that the BoN will be able to consider for censure. then if true you have been lying about the consequences of my actions in reporting the matter Not a one. You may continue to lie to yourself and make up tales for the NG all you care to. you are and have been lying to yourself and the NG for years so why should try ...in the interest of accuracy. it is more acccurate than Stevie own post was, more accurate than most of yours Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ght...... you agree than cut Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? Hey Dave... He's too danged stupid to realize what he said or did...Let's just let him dwell on it and laugh at him while he chases his tail! what case? cut in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance And Tennessee will. which means that tennesse will not be considering such things a s my sexuality and that dave was wrong in saying they would And when they are done, MY attorneys get to earn their keep! for what? if you are telling the truth then you will not be harmed in any way by my action, therefore no tort was done therefore no case exists for them to prusue If I am right then you also have no case you are in a no win affair sir you may be able to break even but that is all THAT will be the end of KB9RQZ's USENET spamming days! another lie from Stevie I do not spam the NG thef0ore it is will not end any spaming by me cut I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it You've not led me on one single goose chase, Markie! yes I have You were never an officer in the Armed Forces. Period. back pedaling again you normaly I never served do make up your mind You were never drafted. never said I was inducted by draft, you assmued that by choosing ( or being unable) to understand a turn of phrase You are not being held hostage by a CO who refuses to let you resign despite your avowed perversions. never said that either andI have have said in the mix something these post is a lie as I was making em, nor was under oath backpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebckpeddleb ckpeddlebackpeddle I call it CYA but if you like prefer the term back peddle but you should use better formating if you are going to play gramous and spelling cop how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? and you are avoiding this issue how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? Hey Markie...I said GO AHEAD AND DO IT! I have according to BoN the investagation will take months but you still have not explained how my lying allows to to lie and say Todds father has aids But I ALSO said that when your malicous attack is over, then I get to play!... no malicous atack exists deal with reality Dave if you can I dare say Dave's reality is a heck of a lot closer TO reality than you, Sparky! who are you adressing sir  my lies conering my rank I can easily explain, and were obviously legal enough that dispite the fact Stevie claims to have reported the matter to the DoD no action was taken You've lied about rank. yes A lie is a lie. Period. then Ferman went to jail for perjury at the OJ trial? You've lied about circumstances regarding your release. some No. Not "some". some you don't know the facts YOU stated that your "CO" refused to allow you to resign. yes I did You've lied about your work. no I haven't have never said anything detailed enough to lie about Sure you did. You said you were in the US Army Chemical Corps. We need no more than that. but I was so no lie exists You've lied about your IQ. wrong again Obviously you HAVE lied. simple falsehood on your part You claim a 248, yet can't seem to master grade school English You are now alicensed school teacher? or the insatllation of simple spellchecker software.. how do I install a spell checker on google? You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt You're the dolt. You HAVE stated your income. where? I have never stated my income ever except in scuh terms as enough to suits my needs I have stated the incomeof a job i turned down 240K that you wrongly choose to assume I was claiming that income level for myself is YOUR mistake not mine therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement backpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebckpeddleb ckpeddlebackpeddle nope you and Dave assumed a statement meant several other things beyond what was said You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Yep. prove it You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited cuting stevie obsene display by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah......Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight........ .......... report me again the result will be no action meaning I am innocent of the allegation asa matter of law I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law Was that a sentence? yes cut Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider You think the BoN wouldn't consider your state of mind under such circumstances...?!?! they can't nor does any defect in myself allow you to claim I have aids or anyone else has aids cut you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else grow up and get over it Dave Musta slipped Dave's name in there while talking to yourself, Markie...... nope gues you can't read I am certainly not a prude, by any standard cut One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you. you and ESP Stevie should remember that you don't know what I can or will do Sure we can. We KNOW you can lie. I certainly can nothing ilegal in thatt We KNOW you can deceive. sure thing I can it is a skill I am proud of We KNOW you are a deviant with potentially unlawful conduct in teh presence of minors. there you go again with the pedophile/child abuse charges We KNOW you will attempt to place yourself in the position of "victim" in order to feign innocence. another lie I am inocent I have done nothing to you ever, and yet you have attacked me since you arrived you lie about me and deny do so you make vile unture claims about me Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am What was that? read it and find out cut you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me Sure we can. you cant determine what you claim to have determined cuting the repiting of load BS you momy is alive what is her address I'll be only to happy to tell her what a hate filled bigot her son has turned into Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No I am sure you are. you can think what you like I am sure you seldom stray more than 30 feet in any direction from the computer and/or refrigerator. you are wrong of course but at lests it is harmless mistake unlike you aids claim Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? So your neighbors can see what kind of an illiterate fool you are. gee I ahve written scuh letters none of my neight sem to think so a couple would like to burn me at statke for one in which I said the world was coming to a sudden firery end if Gay were allowed to marry and I got pretty good reveiws on one where I said the 10 comenedants had their place just not in public school but the question which you choose to misunderstand was why should I write a letter to editor localy about Dave context man you realy need to work on context cut none presented for your either You're the one spouting what real doctors would say. None have popped up here to challenge my diagnosis, Colonel. becuase you can't make one Look at the lines I wrote above. I *did* make one. if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished More random letters and occassional words in search of order, Markie...... more stevei making fun of the disale which is defined as abuse when done by a sprofesional in medical feild by the state of TN BTW although it is not covered through the BoN but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once You couldn't "take on" on of the "Pink Ladies" at the hospital auxiliary in a game of Bingo. No I could not I loath bingo, makes me want to throw up, but your point wass or were just vilifiing again? Stvie has ****ed me off enough..........(SNIP) Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh! Markie-warkie is MAD! (UNSNIP)....and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG only Phil Kane has to be more careful and since he is an antonry...(SNIP) He is? he says so he apprears to be I thought he was an attorney. **** you and your spelling cop ****, and hope youare in fact lying when you claim I have aids (UNSNIP)...not a paralegal (Stevie is the nursing version of a paralegal) Oh? It doesn't say "Paranurse" any where on my license. never said it did And Markie...there's only about six things I cannot due as an LPN that I will be able to du as an RN. Do YOU know what they are? I do... the reference is not to the difference bewtween LPN and RN but nurses and Doctors if you understood english you would realize i i was saying Nurses are to Doctors as Paralegals are to Attonreys cut Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years But you HAVE lied about it. yes I have What you haven't done is APOLOGIZE for it. but I have However that was made to DoD which is the body entitled to it cut Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that cuting steveie evdading the issue that you choose to assume I did so becuase I was claiming to make that or more is not my fault You just lied Dave No he didn't. yes he did cut Make that "at least three lies spouted by you". where disgreeing with you or confsuing you becuase you can't think or understand what is being said isn't lying "...or confsuing you..." What you meant to say is that you are trying to intentionally deceive... I am not responible for what you and Dave try to misread into something That IS a lie, Markie. meaning Dave was in fact lying by questioning me about my 200k income trying to deceive everyone into believing I said something I had not indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say I say you're an idiot. You claim to have an IQ of 248 but then write sentences like the last three above. that is what being LD is all about Stevie, indeed it lies close to very meaning fo the term LD As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? Anywhere. no where Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations No... YOU are the one with the chip...The one that says "The World Owes Me Everything And I Owe It Nothing". never said anything of the sort you are lying again I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Thanks for providing ME with the stuff I need, Markie. for what to claim Todd father has AIDS let me help you then I am Bisexual kinky Dave is leing about defaction of course but who cares other than you You by my starndard are the prevert "standard" "pervert". Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. you too by my religious standard you and everyone else in the NG is a prevert by being either Homo or Heterosexual, by defining the ability to love soley based on what is between one legs you defile the very principles of nature and of the devine by the first amendant I am allowed to believe it unlike you and dave I dont go around demanding that anyone else confrom to my religious standards cut ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff So then you acknowldge that you intentionally spam USENET with semi-illiterate dreck in an attempt to create disorganization and confusion. no i don't in detail I don't spam the usenet at all I am not intionaly illeterate at all ( I am untintetionaly and unwillingly disgraphic but that is not the same) I make no amttepmt to create disorder and/or confusion four false statements in one, Stevie you going for a record? you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint W H E R E did Dave say "Mine is the only viewpoint"...?!?!?! in claiming as you do BTWthat your sexual morality is the only valid one amoug other such efforts You can't learn morse code ..... true enough cut off topic remark .....and it is someone else's fault. never claimed that is another lie from you Dave Nope...You have. another stevie lie I have never claimed that my lack of ability is ANYBODIES fault Sure you have...You went on and on once upon a time about how you were failed by your special ed teachers. no I have not I siad there effort failed I never said it was their fault It the fault of others that Codes testing contues to be requiredbut that is another matter "Fault"...?!?! You tell numerous lies wrong N U M E R O U S lies. nope cut the ranting and begin to call numerous others "lier". I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies ctuing stevie rants you have lied today in saying I claimed a 200k income I have not you asumed incorrectly that that came as the only reason I would turn down a job making 240K. That you are (I infer from your action) a person that would do anything for money ( or something like that) and you assume everyone is like you (given the obvious differences betwen us assuming I would do anything the same way as you is REALY stupid Dave) is not my fault you making incorrctly making assumetion beyond what I have said does not make me liar but when you make make statement of fact based on your incorect deduction it makes you the liar cuting more stevie tnagents .. not sure if you need an Optical felow or MD or an MSSW I believe that you aren't sure of much of anything. true enough I am abosolutely sure of nothing. Including your English skills. agreed after all I believe in the reality of Heisenburg's work, as well as , being a general skeptic There are some things you really, REALLY ought to NOT be skeptical about, Markie... more of your efforts to imply your way is the only way cut Hf access is needed for life? Obviously for you and Lennie, it is.... bull**** another made up charge on your part how is taking part in the porcess of making the rules as provided for cut Mark is *special* and we have to make allowances for him. never said that anywhere Sure you have! Every single one of your "I'll file an ADA claim" rants! never made such a rant that is another lie in claiming I have No...it's another "Google provides" moment. then let it provide if it could You blame all of your numerous problems on others. another lie Dave Mark Morgan on a number of issues: "Your problem" so if you can reason correctly this not my problem I refer you to detailed response above to your lie about my claim of a 200k income Markie, nice try trying to spin ONE issue into an entire whitewash of YOUR lies, YOUR deceit, YOUR cowardace and YOUR misconduct. I choose not to waste more bandwidwith on an issue you and Dave have decided to lie about I have not blamed you for any of MY rpoblems, I have points out you have your own problem What problems? Being intolerant of liars and deceivers is a "probem"...?!?! yes cut if it is your wosh that I try and get you fired, I am willing to help you out, but you need to provide the name of your boss a means of contacting him and I promise to look into it Oh? Did Steve provide you the name of his boss and a means of contacting him? Go to work, shirker. we are talking about YOU Hey Markie! Who was the one whining about "carrying others freight"...?!?! me bu that isnt the issue You want it? You earn it! But I don't Dave fired Indeed I think I want him to get lots more hours at work so he doesn't have to time to come here and talk **** OH! Wait a minute.....W H A T W A S I T H I N K I N G ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? Your whole reason for being in this forum is about getting what you haven't earned! more lies stveie from you Silly me! WHAT was I thinking...?!?! do you even know what you are thinking? do you even think? if you truely want me to get you fired then you are asking for my help and to get it you must pay MY price I don't want you or Stevie fired from your jobs for my own sake. Oooooops! Markie caught in BIG LIE! nope Markie...What do you think my employer would do if the BoN granted your wishes and revoked my Nursing license...?!?! you would be fired, however your being fired is not my goal, it would be side effect one indeed that I would regret since it would give you more time to hang here what I want is justice. in your case true justice would be your being behind bars withe rumour put outthere that you are pedophile and child killer but they could trump up some minor charge due to lack of evidence, then the prisons would show the dangers created with false claims of child abuse and pedophilia. That IMO would be justice for you. forunately there is zero chance of your getting that treatment. Faling that there IS Justice IMO in the happnestance of the man who claims he will not tolerate lying being punished in any way for lying See! You CAN'T have your cake and eat it too! but I don't want the cake you think I want you don't understand me Stevie I don't realy understand you ( not that I want to, and likely you think the same) In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see You go RIGHT AHEAD, Markie! going right ahead but you could do us a favor and hold breath till it is over Steve, K4YZ |
|
#56
November 10th 05, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? Are you narcoleptic? no Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia I used the terms pricisely cut I think you may be in for an awfully big surprise. you think that would be newsflash right I think it would be newsflash? No, I think you may be in for a surprise. you thinking would be the newsflash I might be in for a suprise but I can see how Stevie or BoN can claim that who I may have sex with allows Stevie to say I have AIDS Dave heil can think stop the presses Okay, I've thought, "stop the presses". Did it happen? nope becuase you failed to think the LAW say the issues you claim are not important What issues did I claim are not important? you did not I did but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality both are legaly irrelevant in this matter I expect TN to obey its own laws Oh, I'd expect that it does. as do I But if you don't think that anyone there would be interested in who is submitting a complaint and why, I am sure they will curious, but I expect them to be profesional in the end don't you? I think you are going to be surprised. no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues" since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie actions in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have enacted? not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some extent. I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are "defferent" in some way Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered. wrong Dave like Stevie you think disagreeing with you is lying No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting we are on the same footing There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it Yes, you certainly have lied. agreed cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? Is Steve acting in a medical capacity here? that is one of the 2 issues for the BoN to decide I would say Yes, as soon as he claims he is making a PROFESSION opinion he is acting in medical capcity as soon as HE gives medical advice to people that KNOW he is an LPN is is as soon as he claims to have used the materail here to act professionaly he is the BoN will make its ruling and act accordingly If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his license if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting him. then you have not been reading I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take place after you've done so. and he is lying about it deal with reality Dave if you can Mark, I don't think you are in a position to tell others about reality. right you don't think but I knew that cut You've lied about your work. Were you ever in the Chemical Corps of the United States Army? yes cutting unsuported bs You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt Haven't you? no I have not therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement So the way we can tell if you aren't lying is because you haven't said anything? not exactly but yuou can assume I making statments I have not made You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type something up because of the expense of paying her. never said that I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the first statement and run off from there You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited There you have most of it. You also lie when it is convenient or when it suits you. not exactly by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so How does one go about doing so? by doing so I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you "tlaking" about? I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats why does everyting have to be repeated for you your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider ...you "legally assume". Those things would seem to go toward establishing the credibility of an accuser. Do you think you'd be seen as credible? they seem might to , to you, but the law ,and the BoN say otherwise other than some kind of Illegal sex ( and I think all that is left in feild is sex with kidds, animals and corpses and rape in the legal sense of the word) the rest does not matter, legaly you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else A prude, Mark? yes a prude. if you prefer another label put it forward with your reasons and I'll consider using it Do you think I'm part of some tiny minority which approves of your lifestyle? no grow up and get over it Dave I'm fully grown and nothing compels me to get over anything. you don't act fully grown, but you are right you don't have to get over anything but it is good advice I have a friend who is a licensed plumber. I'll be sure to tell him to watch his P's and Q's when posting here, lest you attempt to have his license revoked. if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you. you and ESP Stevie should remember that I don't think either of us is likely to forget it. I do but more Stevie than yourself you don't know what I can or will do About the only things I can reasonably expect is that it won't be 1) reasonable, 2) rational or 3) truthful more BS Dave Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am I don't believe you to be rational, If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be. If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you than If I am the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent .. you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me I know enough about you that I'd not want to hang out with you, work with you or have a series of QSOs about what interests you. ture enough and I can say the same of you of course cut Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No Then hop to it. to what? Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? ...to tell him that I've been mean to you. to what end? cut you do have such a rich fantasy life Dave Do you think I made up the part about reading a newspaper? having a nearby TV station? What part do you believe to be fantasy? that you state I should find either the proper venue to deal with you cut if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished That doesn't track, Colonel. sure does I'm not Steve are you certain it is hard to tell some days . I made a diagnosis. See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished. First I'll try to deal with Stevie he has a license to revoke you don't further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment, futher still dealing with Stevie liecense which he uses to obtain criedbilty will alos lessen yours to say much the same thing Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once I cringe to think what that might mean. you should Stvie has ****ed me off enough and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy posting in an amateur radio newsgroup. some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG did get it from Stevie ...only Phil Kane has to be more careful and since he is an antonry not a paralegal... I'm sure that it will come as a great surprise to Phil to find that he is an antonry. ...(Stevie is the nursing version of a paralegal) he has greater latittude in giving professional LEGAL oppinions than Stevie has in Giving PROFESSIONAL nursing opinions Why have you chosen to write "professional LEGAL" and "PROFESSIONAL nursing"? It pleased me to do so I need NO other reason cut BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you* doing the lying. you contiue to lie after being told the truth further you have never had much reason to tell the lie I have admit to the lie Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps? asked and answered yes Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago ...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman recognized as having the highest tested IQ? can't addrss you issue without more data Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that My mistake. no it was YOUR lie prhaps your claim about turning down "240k" has a built-in fudge factor I turned a job overing 240,000.00$ per year becuase I did not need the money badly enough to tkae the risk you assumed the rest You didn't say what the "k" was. Perhaps it was 240k dimes. that you choose to assume I did so becuase I was claiming to make that or more is not my fault You just lied Dave No, I asked you a question. no you lied in saying I lied about my income I have never stated my income in RRAP indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can know much of anything you are trying to say. then you agree meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement beyond a direct in context quote period As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? Anywhere. where are you using some specail definiation of "deal" i should know about There is no "specail definiation" but I think you should learn the commonly used definitions. I am dealing with you now I am always looking for something more effect but with you so far no dice Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations "Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly accepted conduct in my life. neither have I I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar You're a real non-confromist, Mark. ok I can live with that label, carries a few overtones of usages I don't like but it isn't bad the question is so what that I am (a nonconformist)? I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Not perverity, Mark. Perversity. You know--yours. none here no prevesity at all Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked about above. what prevestity? nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list You by my starndard are the prevert I'm sure that you believe that. The world doesn't seem to operate on your "starnard". nor do I think it has to you OTOH think the world and everyone in MUST confrom to yours I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it There's the story of your life, Mark. nope perhaps yours from all apearances I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do. you certainly do well documented indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine You're a pervert and everyone who isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a spellchecke... and your and stevie whine and whine about it I complain about it. you whine about it Steve has complained about it. he whines about Others have complained about it. they whine about ti You tell all, "your probelm". not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff, nobdoy is making you. Is someone making you? I keep asking and you keep ducking the question Killfle me that is your previeledge Thanks for illustrating my point. no it illustrates MINE ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others? other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint My target is the lurker population out there you and the rest are idea and text to play and use to help me make my point to my target Would you have us believe that you don't care if others can't make sense of your writing ...... yes I have said so many times ....or that they find it laborious to decipher it? no but you asked the worng question I find it desirable that those that choose to read it find laborious to read Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement "if you don't work it for you don't value it" therefore since being rough to read is easier path for me anyway by going with that flow I feel i reach a segement that is receptive the No Coder PoV and isn't geting it from the easier to read spokes people that my foes also find it hard to read I find yet an added Bonus you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint Right, Mark. Nothing is right or wrong, good or bad. There are only shades of gray. exactly glad you agree or more precisely nothing is ALWAYS good or bad, even murder myhem, have their proper uses the problem with murder is not that it is never a good thing, it is that it is used in far too many cases where it is a bad thing You can't learn morse code ..... true enough .....and it is someone else's fault. never claimed that is another lie from you Dave Didn't you claim that attempting to learn morse was "torture"? yes I did, and it is for me but tis is not the same as saying my lack of skill is somebodies elses fault so your statement was and remains a lie Were you only torturing yourself? obviously I have never claimed that my lack of ability is ANYBODIES fault It the fault of others that Codes testing contues to be requiredbut that is another matter and you duck the point You tell numerous lies wrong Wrong? You admitted it above in the very same posting! no i don't I lie but i quuible on the details and begin to call numerous others "lier". I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies Would you like to adjust the number? no cut That you are (I infer from your action) a person that would do anything for money ( or something like that) and you assume everyone is like you (given the obvious differences betwen us assuming I would do anything the same way as you is REALY stupid Dave) is not my fault Nothing is ever your fault, Mark. Your comments do not read as those of a person with an IQ of 248. projecting again Dave How is it my fault that you have made a bad guess? you making incorrctly making assumetion beyond what I have said does not make me liar but when you make make statement of fact based on your incorect deduction it makes you the liar "you making incrrctly making assumetion"? Your frequent lies make you a liar, Mark. That's it in a nutshell. you failure to state the truth about what I have said makes YOU the liar that is it in nutshell You KNOW i am a non comfromist yet you insit that you appply your confist thinking to my way of life and deduce anything with any corelation to my views You've shrouded yourself in victimhood and you want a free ride in life. another lie on your part HF access in amateur radio? how does this question relate to your claim? You want a free ride in amateur radio. no I don't You want the regs changed to accommodate you. wrong again I want the regs changed to reflect what I see as the best interests of the ARS Judging by the fact NoCode is about to prevail It is about a lot more than my wants, and a fair number of people agree with me on what the regs should including it appears the people that make em how that is just about accomodating I frankly don't know Hf access is needed for life? I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context but I don't need HF in my or for my life I desire it yes I don't need it all how is taking part in the porcess of making the rules as provided for by law asking for a free ride in life? You demand that the standards for obtaining HF amateur radio access be lowered for *you*. no I don't I am taking part in the provided for system of seting what the rules should be for all as I Bill Sohl Brain, Carl, Len Todd, even you and Stevie ( jim and all the rest) Others should have to try to decipher your writing? you DON"T have to try to deipher my writing. I have never said you do. You choose to do so, if you don't like the rsults of your efforts make another CHOICE nonone is holding a gun to your head and forcing you is there? certainly not by my order, if you think someone is holding a gun to head and making you read my stuf call 911, i am certain (a rarity for me) that in this event and you call someone will help you. Why are you babbling about calling 911 and someone holding a gun to someone's head? you are babbling as if someone is making you read my posts Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff if it is too hard for don't it is your free choice unless there is gunman there or something like that Is the object of your posting here to communicate your thoughts to others? other yes you maybe, maybe not If it is, you aren't doing a very good job of it. maybe I am achiveing my goals maybe not that is for ME to judge One would think that you'd do all in your power to make your posts as well written and concise as possible. YOU think so, I disagree You don't do so. agreed as is my right cut Okay, I'm telling you that Steve didn't provide you the name, address and telephone number of his employer or of the employer's supervising organization. I refuse to be held to a different standard. Go to work. why should I work at getting you fired when I don't want you be fired? cut In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see The result may be that you ending up with your ass in a crack. We shall see. Enough of that. Your current problem is to find out who and where my employer is. not my problem not my interest and not my goal Then you'll need to find out who to contact in order to point out that I've belittled and made fun of you. Be sure to tell them that I see you as a liar and a pervert. Let them know that I refuse to be politically correct in dealing with you. Good luck with your jihad. If were to try and get yuou fired Id talk about you not me there is plenty there in your past on here but of course I want you wroking LOTS of OVERTIME not fired Dave K8MN |
|
#57
November 11th 05, 05:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? Are you narcoleptic? no Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia Interesting but it doesn't change what I wrote. You are imprecise with the written word. I used the terms pricisely You didn't even use the word "precisely" precisely. cut the LAW say the issues you claim are not important What issues did I claim are not important? you did not I did That isn't what you wrote. You are imprecise in the use of the written word. but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality both are legaly irrelevant in this matter That has yet to be determined. I think you are going to be surprised. no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues" since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie actions That'll be great. You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have enacted? not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some extent. I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are "defferent" in some way Oh, you're "defferent" okay. Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered. wrong Dave like Stevie you think disagreeing with you is lying No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do No, Mark, that is simply incorrect. In fact, I just told you so previously. Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie Keep in mind that you've just admitted to being a liar. Further down the post, you'll deny it. You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. No, Mark, you aren't. You have a number of issues. Lying is just one of them. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income So you say. I admitted to being mistaken. Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting Did you admite to child mosting? we are on the same footing No, Mark, we assuredly are not. There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them You justify your lies by pointing to someone else? I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it Yes, you certainly have lied. agreed Keep in mind that you've agreed that you have lied. Further in the post, you deny it. cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped I don't need repating, Mark. I have a full head of hair. By the way, you don't really think my words are dumped when you cut them in a reply, do you? I checked and my original post is still there. All of my words are intact. how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? Is Steve acting in a medical capacity here? that is one of the 2 issues for the BoN to decide Is it? I would say Yes, as soon as he claims he is making a PROFESSION opinion he is acting in medical capcity I've seen newsgroup posts where folks profess belief that a New World Order will result in global government, that the President and Vice- President planned the attacks on the World Trade Center and that someone has invented a miracle penis enlarger. I put no credence in any of them. as soon as HE gives medical advice to people that KNOW he is an LPN is is as soon as he claims to have used the materail here to act professionaly he is the BoN will make its ruling and act accordingly Maybe it will and maybe it'll write you off as a crackpot. If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his license Maybe he will and maybe he won't. if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done I wouldn't bank on that. how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting him. then you have not been reading I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take place after you've done so. and he is lying about it I wouldn't bank on that either. deal with reality Dave if you can Mark, I don't think you are in a position to tell others about reality. right you don't think but I knew that That can't be right. You told me that you can't be absolutely sure of anything. cut You've lied about your work. Were you ever in the Chemical Corps of the United States Army? yes cutting unsuported bs You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt Haven't you? no I have not Okay, you've lied about your potential income. therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement So the way we can tell if you aren't lying is because you haven't said anything? not exactly but yuou can assume I making statments I have not made We'll have to wait for the exact translation of that one. You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type something up because of the expense of paying her. never said that I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it Read what I wrote. Please point to the portion where I wrote that you "could not pay for it". that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the first statement and run off from there No, that isn't the problem. You responded to what I wrote and said I'd written something I hadn't written. You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited Remember that you wrote that. Further along in the post, you'll deny it. There you have most of it. You also lie when it is convenient or when it suits you. not exactly You're waffling now, Mark. by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so How does one go about doing so? by doing so That's a circular response. I'd expect better of an individual with an IQ of 248. I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you "tlaking" about? I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats I see. You told the FBI that you'd reported yourself to the FBI? why does everyting have to be repeated for you ....because the answers keep moving in a veritable carousel of untruth. your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider ...you "legally assume". Those things would seem to go toward establishing the credibility of an accuser. Do you think you'd be seen as credible? they seem might to , to you, but the law ,and the BoN say otherwise You'd have to show that the law and the Tennessee Board of Nursing say otherwise. I'm afraid I can't accept your word. other than some kind of Illegal sex ( and I think all that is left in feild is sex with kidds, animals and corpses and rape in the legal sense of the word) the rest does not matter, legaly ....and the other kinds don't matter to you morally? you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else A prude, Mark? yes a prude. if you prefer another label put it forward with your reasons and I'll consider using it Do you think I'm part of some tiny minority which approves of your lifestyle? no Then if your sexual practices fall outside what society finds "acceptable", I'm no prude. grow up and get over it Dave I'm fully grown and nothing compels me to get over anything. you don't act fully grown, but you are right you don't have to get over anything but it is good advice If you were the very last guy left in this newsgroup, I'd not be taking advice from you. you don't know what I can or will do About the only things I can reasonably expect is that it won't be 1) reasonable, 2) rational or 3) truthful more BS Dave Not at all, Mark. It is gospel. Base upon reading your material here and elsewhere, those are the things I expect. Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am I don't believe you to be rational, If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be. Are you now telling me that I should be afraid of you? If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you than If I am Are you now telling me that I should be afraid of you? the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent . You cut yourself off before writing the tangent? you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me I know enough about you that I'd not want to hang out with you, work with you or have a series of QSOs about what interests you. ture enough and I can say the same of you of course cut Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No Then hop to it. to what? Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? ...to tell him that I've been mean to you. to what end? ....both ends. cut you do have such a rich fantasy life Dave Do you think I made up the part about reading a newspaper? having a nearby TV station? What part do you believe to be fantasy? that you state I should find either the proper venue to deal with you cut Why'd you cut your words before you completed the thought? Either the proper venue to deal with me or what? if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished That doesn't track, Colonel. sure does I'm not Steve are you certain it is hard to tell some days I'm sure that's the case for you. If it will help you, I sign my posts "Dave K8MN". . I made a diagnosis. See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished. First I'll try to deal with Stevie he has a license to revoke you don't ....that you know of. Hey! I have an amateur radio license. Why not see if you can get it revoked. further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment, You have a record of finding people to be dangerous to you. futher still dealing with Stevie liecense which he uses to obtain criedbilty will alos lessen yours to say much the same thing That's some faulty logic you've got there, Mark. Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you It is probably wise of you not to have formulated such a plan. therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will There's not much evidence of focus on your part. but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once I cringe to think what that might mean. you should Why? Is the reality worse than I can imagine? Stvie has ****ed me off enough and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy posting in an amateur radio newsgroup. some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG did get it from Stevie Crufing you? I'll bet that hurts. BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you* doing the lying. you contiue to lie after being told the truth With you, no one can be sure of when you tell the truth and when you lie. It appears that you lie until you are caught at it. Afterward, you may come clean or you may tell another lie to cover the original lie. further you have never had much reason to tell the lie Get it straight, Colonel. I didn't tell the lie. You did. I have admit to the lie Yep, to that one. Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps? asked and answered yes How can I believe you? Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago ...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman recognized as having the highest tested IQ? can't addrss you issue without more data You can't address the issue? Did anyone ever tell you that you had the highest tested IQ on the planet? Perhaps you need a little more time to polish the follow up lie. Here's some data for you ( from http://www.audiblox.com/iq_scores.htm ) IQ Description % of Population 130+ Very Superior 2.2 120-129 Superior 6.7 110-119 High Average 16.1 90-109 Average 50 80-89 Low Average 16.1 70-79 Borderline 6.7 Below 70 Extremely Low 2.2 from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_vos_Savant "Marilyn vos Savant (born August 11, 1946) is an American magazine columnist, author, lecturer, and playwright who rose to fame through her listing in the Guinness Book of World Records under "Highest IQ". Since 1986 she has written Ask Marilyn, a Sunday column in Parade magazine in which she answers questions from readers on a variety of subjects..." "...Her Stanford-Binet score is discussed in a 1989 New York magazine article by Julie Baumgold (Baumgold 1989). Marilyn took the Stanford-Binet when she was ten years old; this was the Second Edition of the test, published in 1937. The Stanford-Binet at that time yielded ratio IQs: scores obtained by dividing mental age (as assessed by the test) by chronological age, and multiplying by 100. Marilyn says she first took the test in September 1956, at the age of 10 years and 0 months, and achieved the ceiling mental age of 22 years and 10 months, yielding an IQ of 228. This was the score listed by Guinness, this is the score she gives in interviews, and this is the score shown in the "About the Author" section of her books. Rounding it up produces the value of 230 which sometimes appears." "The figure of 167+ comes from a school record cited by Baumgold indicating that Marilyn took the Stanford-Binet in March 1957, at the age of 10 years and 8 months, and achieved a mental age of "17-10+" (meaning at least 17 years and 10 months). It is unclear how the recorded chronological age was derived; dates in March are 6 or 7 months from her August birthday, not 8. It is also unclear how this record relates to the account given in the previous paragraph. The Stanford-Binet at that time had two forms (Form L and Form M), so one possibility is that Marilyn took the test twice." "The figure of 218 was derived by psychometrician Ronald K. Hoeflin, using a chronological age of 10 years and 6 months, and a mental age of 22 years and 11 months. This figure seems to have no obvious rationale. The ceiling of the Second Edition of the Stanford-Binet was 22 years and 10 months, not 11 months (Terman 1937), and a chronological age of 10 years and 6 months corresponds neither to the age in Marilyn's account nor to the age in the school record cited by Baumgold (although it could fit a March test date)." "The second intelligence test mentioned by Guinness is the Mega Test, designed by Hoeflin and taken by Marilyn as an adult in the mid-1980s. The Mega Test yields deviation IQs: scores obtained by multiplying the testee's z-score (the rarity of their raw score on the test) by a constant standard deviation (in this case 16) and then adding 100. Marilyn's raw score was 46 out of 48, corresponding in the latest norming of the test to a z-score of 5.4 and therefore an IQ of 186, a percentile of 99.999997, and a rarity of 1 in 30,000,000 (Hoeflin 1989)." Now, is there anything you'd care to clarify about your claimed IQ? Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that My mistake. no it was YOUR lie NO, Mark, it was my mistake. I confused your supposed job offer with the claim of actual employment. prhaps your claim about turning down "240k" has a built-in fudge factor I turned a job overing 240,000.00$ per year becuase I did not need the money badly enough to tkae the risk Sure you did, Mark. you assumed the rest Sometimes you just have to tkae the risk. indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can know much of anything you are trying to say. then you agree If you think I've agreed, then your reading is as bad as your writing. meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement beyond a direct in context quote period As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? Anywhere. where It has been answered, Mark. Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations "Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly accepted conduct in my life. neither have I Yes, you have, Mark. I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar Are you posting to a public newsgroup? Have you posted to public newsgroups catering to those with peculiar sexual desires? Would a man who demands a "right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar (sic), be doing so? You're a real non-confromist, Mark. ok I can live with that label, carries a few overtones of usages I don't like but it isn't bad When spelled your way, it carries more than a few. the question is so what that I am (a nonconformist)? Oh, now you want to be a non-conformist! I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Not perverity, Mark. Perversity. You know--yours. none here no prevesity at all Not "prevesity", Mark. Perversity. Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked about above. what prevestity? No, not "prevestity", Mark. I wrote about your perversity. nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list Perverse, Mark, not "preverse" and I'm not talking of your standards, I mean societal standards. You by my starndard are the prevert I'm sure that you believe that. The world doesn't seem to operate on your "starnard". nor do I think it has to Lucky for the world. you OTOH think the world and everyone in MUST confrom to yours Society says that there are things which you can and can't do. There are things you can and can't say. I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it There's the story of your life, Mark. nope perhaps yours from all apearances I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do. you certainly do well documented That is yet another falsehood on your part. indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine Mark, you're making one fabrication after another. You tell all, "your probelm". not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff, nobdoy is making you. Is Mister Nobdoy in charge of newsgroup enforcement? Is someone making you? Perhaps Mister Nobdoy compels you to read my posts. I keep asking and you keep ducking the question To paraphrase you: I owe you no response. Killfle me that is your previeledge Thanks for illustrating my point. no it illustrates MINE Your point is that you can't write clearly? ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others? other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint My target is the lurker population out there ....and the lurkers will be able to read and comprehend your gibberish, but no one else can. How can I compete with logic such as that? you and the rest are idea and text to play and use to help me make my point to my target The rest of us are idea and text and you believe you are making a point to a target? There's more of that 248 IQ at work. Would you have us believe that you don't care if others can't make sense of your writing ...... yes I have said so many times So now you don't care about your target audience? ....or that they find it laborious to decipher it? no but you asked the worng question I find it desirable that those that choose to read it find laborious to read So the target audience isn't supposed to read your posts but they'll understand you anyway? Hmmmm. Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement "if you don't work it for you don't value it" That's some amusement. You come off like an idiot because you don't work at writing and that's supposed to hit the PCTA right in the breadbasket, huh? therefore since being rough to read is easier path for me anyway by going with that flow I feel i reach a segement that is receptive the No Coder PoV and isn't geting it from the easier to read spokes people Tell you what Mark, that has to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read from anyone. that my foes also find it hard to read I find yet an added Bonus Pretty slick, Mark, and you've told us you don't care if your target reads your stuff. So, the only person who is supposed to read your stuff is....you? you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint Right, Mark. Nothing is right or wrong, good or bad. There are only shades of gray. exactly glad you agree or more precisely nothing is ALWAYS good or bad, even murder myhem, have their proper uses the problem with murder is not that it is never a good thing, it is that it is used in far too many cases where it is a bad thing Oh, I'm not agreeing with you, Mark, just the opposite. I firmly believe that murder is not a gray area. The one point I'll concede is on the topic of your hem. Both above the knee and below the knee are "in" this fall. You tell numerous lies wrong Wrong? You admitted it above in the very same posting! no i don't I lie but i quuible on the details You may now refer to the portions above where you admitted directly to lying. Dave K8MN |
|
#58
November 11th 05, 11:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
More Markie Mularkie
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia I used the terms pricisely No, you did not. You were IMPRECISE in your use of the words. Your TYPING errors come from laziness and haste, NOT dyslexia. There is NO SUCH THING as "dyslexiod aphasia". "WebMD", Tabor's and the Stedman's Guide all concur. More than likely your MD told you one thing and you were too embarrassed to admit you didn't understand so just made up something that sounds like what he told you. I think you are going to be surprised. no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues" since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie actions And you continue to function as though you understand the BoN rules. You quite clearly do not, but good luck anyway. I continue to add your "pearls" to the CD. It will make interesting reading in Nashville if I am tasked to respond to a "complaint". No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie No, Dave and I have not. You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. No, you're not. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting But MARKIE, YOU are the one that said it's "OK" to just use ANY "definition" of ANY word as you see fit without ensuring that all parties of the discussion agree on WHICH definition is being used. That's part of the CD too. Remember all your arguments on the use of the term "drafted"...?!?! You INSISTED that YOUR definition was not the one used by the DoD, yet it IS a military application we were addressing... It's part of the record, Markie. Good luck squeezing out from under that one. we are on the same footing Nooooooooooooooooooo...we're not. Dave and I are professionals, recognized by our peers in our seperate disciplines as such. Any "defense" I have to mount will include testimony of people who are also known and recognized within my profession. None of them are allegedly dyslexic gay pagan Colonels in the "Chemical Corps" who can't manage to use a spellchecker in their correspondences and "admit" that they consider lying to be a "right" or moral responsibility to teach their children. There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them See, Markie...There you go with that "disagreeing is lying" thing...You seem to think it ony applies to others...And therein lies part of your downfall. I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it Yes, you certainly have lied. agreed cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped But not before you publically acknowledged, again, your propensity for lying. Thanks. If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his license if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done "Stevie" is right, but there WILL be "harm done"...to the person filing a malicious complaint... how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting him. then you have not been reading I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take place after you've done so. and he is lying about it There's no lying here by me. I am telling you straight up...I am not taking a slapping by you at the Board of Nursing and then just letting you get away with it. The nature of your maliciousness is established here. Thanks. You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type something up because of the expense of paying her. never said that Damn, Mark...caught lying again... I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it Nope. That's NOT what you said. that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the first statement and run off from there No, we take a statement from you that says "I can't afford to pay right now" and take it at face value that you can't afford to pay. There's no shame in not having some discretionary cash on hand, Markie...It happens all the time... I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you "tlaking" about? I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats why does everyting have to be repeated for you So we can document you in yet ANOTHER of your twists of the tale, Markie! I don't believe you to be rational, If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be. As usual, Markie, tripped yourself up. If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you than If I am Was that a sentence? What did you say? the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent Only reality and rationality are not "tangental" to you, Markie. See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished. First I'll try to deal with Stevie he has a license to revoke you don't further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment, You can't even spell "judgement" let alone express a valid opinion. Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....PUNISHMENT! That's what Markie wants! therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will Evidence of STALKING, Markie! Thanks! Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy posting in an amateur radio newsgroup. some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG did get it from Stevie "crufing" you...?!?! WTF is "crufing"...?!?! You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you* doing the lying. you contiue to lie after being told the truth further you have never had much reason to tell the lie He never HAS told a lie that I am aware of... YOU, on the other hand, have. I have admit to the lie Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps? asked and answered yes Asked and lied about. Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago ...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman recognized as having the highest tested IQ? can't addrss you issue without more data What you MEAN is that you made up a number, however there's REAL evidence that YOUR number is so ludicrous as to simply prove that you've been caught AGAIN! indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can know much of anything you are trying to say. then you agree meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement beyond a direct in context quote period Which IS to say that you are ATTEMPTING to be deceitful in order to create an enviroment of distrust and miscommunication... Which is to say you are willfully lying. Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations "Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly accepted conduct in my life. neither have I An ABSOLUTE LIE! And one perpetrated in this NG over and over...God knows what you're like in "real" life...! ! ! ! I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar Then why MAKE it anyone's affair by airing your dirty underwear in here? Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked about above. what prevestity? "prevestity" is not a word. nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list "preverse"...Before the verse? I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do. you certainly do well documented indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA COUGHCOUGHSNORTSNORT BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! You're a pervert and everyone who isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a spellchecke... and your and stevie whine and whine about it I complain about it. you whine about it Everybody's a whiner except Markie. Steve has complained about it. he whines about Everybody's a whiner except Markie. Others have complained about it. they whine about ti See! What did I tell you! Everybody's a whiner except Markie! You tell all, "your probelm". not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff, nobdoy is making you. Is someone making you? You are, when you spam the NG with it. I keep asking and you keep ducking the question Killfle me that is your previeledge Thanks for illustrating my point. no it illustrates MINE No, it doesn't. ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others? other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint In other words, anyone who disagrees with you. My target is the lurker population out there I am sure that they are just DYING to know what Mark Morgan thinks! (...visions of people leaning over, cupping their ear as in the "E.F. Hutton" commercials...) Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement "if you don't work it for you don't value it" Huh? I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies Would you like to adjust the number? no You should. I came up with twelve off the top of my head, and that was without doing any "Googling"..... You want the regs changed to accommodate you. wrong again I want the regs changed to reflect what I see as the best interests of the ARS No...You want the rules changed to accomodate you. Judging by the fact NoCode is about to prevail It is about a lot more than my wants, and a fair number of people agree with me on what the regs should including it appears the people that make em A fair numbr of people agree with you taht they don't want to have to actually do something to get something...That's been the trend since the 60's...thanks Abbie Hoffman, Timothy Leary, etc etc etc... I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face! Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives might be in order! Okay, I'm telling you that Steve didn't provide you the name, address and telephone number of his employer or of the employer's supervising organization. I refuse to be held to a different standard. Go to work. why should I work at getting you fired when I don't want you be fired? Trust me, Markie...I am the one you don't want fired! In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see The result may be that you ending up with your ### in a crack. We shall see. Enough of that. Your current problem is to find out who and where my employer is. not my problem not my interest and not my goal Yes, having YOUR ### in a crack is a problem. Then you'll need to find out who to contact in order to point out that I've belittled and made fun of you. Be sure to tell them that I see you as a liar and a pervert. Let them know that I refuse to be politically correct in dealing with you. Good luck with your jihad. If were to try and get yuou fired Id talk about you not me there is plenty there in your past on here but of course I want you wroking LOTS of OVERTIME not fired "wroking"...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
|
#59
November 11th 05, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
More Brain and Markie Stretching
K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 6 Nov 2005 08:11:37 -0800, wrote: Yep, he even used "professional" to describe that he wasn't just some yahoo, but a medical professional. and i hope that is what is going to nail with the nursing board Nothing you or me say is going to sway the nurses board. Unintentional, I am sure, but finally a modicum of sanity displayed by one of the Feeble Five. Steve, somehow I don't think my Somalia logbooks will be much of a concern to your board, or whether or not I read a 1958 copy of "This is the Air Force," or if you were really an "A" NCOIC of Okinawa MARS. I'm going to guess that it's your behavior that they'll be looking at. You may be able to prove that Mark misspells words and doesn't finish his thoughts when writing to the group. You may be able to prove that Mark's faith isn't mainstream, or that he is gay or bi or whatever. You might even be able to prove that he thinks that you're an asshole like I do. But if you stepped out of bounds and used your Nurse credentials to use another states health or child services professionals, or police or Sheriff personnel to harass Mark, then that's what they'll probably be considering. So at the end of the day, if you did "dial" Illinois, you'll have some real explaining to do. Somehow I don't think my Somalia logbooks will be much of a concern to your board, but you might think differently. Good luck. |
|
#60
November 11th 05, 04:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut cut with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia Interesting but it doesn't change what I wrote. You are imprecise with the written word. then so what if that is what you mean bashing for my disablity is not noble behavoir Dave, nor something that will make me inclined to do as you wish cuting davei spliting hair again but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality both are legaly irrelevant in this matter That has yet to be determined. not as I see it the history of the law on this subject is clear cut You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have enacted? not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some extent. I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are "defferent" in some way Oh, you're "defferent" okay. yes I am, get over it, you will be happier that way cut No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do No, Mark, that is simply incorrect. In fact, I just told you so previously. Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie Keep in mind that you've just admitted to being a liar. Further down the post, you'll deny it. and you have been labeled a liar asnwered the coment and not denied being liar You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. No, Mark, you aren't. why not? You have a number of issues. such as? Lying is just one of them. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income So you say. I admitted to being mistaken. and you have falsely tried to blame me for your mistake Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting Did you admite to child mosting? no we are on the same footing No, Mark, we assuredly are not. why not? Stevie lies about people, falsely accuses them of crimes, lies about things he has NO way of knowing There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them You justify your lies by pointing to someone else? no i don't my lies need no defense, since they have harmed no one. "No harm no foul" is how Lawyers are taught to think when looking at Torts and to consider this issue in all legal matters Stevie lies to attack and harm others, I do not cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped I don't need repating, Mark. I have a full head of hair. By the way, you don't really think my words are dumped when you cut them in a reply, do you? cut if you want to be stupid I will not bother with more of your post if you don't to repaet yourself then don't I don't care wether you you have any hair lots of it or hairy plams but you are being stupid to suggest I think cuting your word means I removeing your post it is as dumb as Stevies claim that when I cut and not bother with some of his word I am censoring him and for that stupid remark the rest of the post is flushed unread |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| reminding stevie again of his past words | Policy | |||
| when is the Stevie Dictionary coming in print | Policy | |||
| stevie shit | Policy | |||
| IT WILL NEVER END, PEEPEEHOLIC, NEVER! | CB | |||
Linear Mode
