Telamon wrote:

Thinking is not activity that suites you very well.

Apparently, thinking doesn't "suite" you very well either.

If I've told you once, I've told you (politely) a dozen times: If you
are going to ridicule someone else's intelligence, please make sure your
own house is in order first. Otherwise, *you* end up looking quite the
fool.

I'm surprised that a person of your obviously superior intellect is
clueless enough to not get that simple point. :-(

suite

NOUN:

1. A staff of attendants or followers; a retinue. 2. 1. A group of
related things intended to be used together; a set. 2. (also st) A
set of matching furnitu a dining room suite. 3. A series of
connected rooms used as a living unit. 4. Music 1. An instrumental
composition, especially of the 17th or 18th century, consisting of a
succession of dances in the same or related keys. 2. An instrumental
composition consisting of a series of varying movements or pieces. 5.
Computer Science 1. A group of software products packaged and sold
together, usually having a consistent look and feel, a common
installation, and shared macros. 2. A group of procedures that work
cooperatively: The TCP/IP suite of protocols includes FTP and Telnet.

Images of self-superiority often have a way of clouding intellect. As
usual, Telamon's images of self-superiority provide a delightfully
ironic twist.

On Feb 5, 8:28*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Thinking is not activity that suites you very well.

Apparently, thinking doesn't "suite" you very well either.

If I've told you once, I've told you (politely) a dozen times: If you
are going to ridicule someone else's intelligence, please make sure your
own house is in order first. Otherwise, *you* end up looking quite the
fool.

I'm surprised that a person of your obviously superior intellect is
clueless enough to not get that simple point. *:-(



suite

NOUN:

1. A staff of attendants or followers; a retinue. 2. 1. A group of
related things intended to be used together; a set. 2. (also st) A
set of matching furnitu a dining room suite. 3. A series of
connected rooms used as a living unit. 4. Music 1. An instrumental
composition, especially of the 17th or 18th century, consisting of a
succession of dances in the same or related keys. 2. An instrumental
composition consisting of a series of varying movements or pieces. 5.
Computer Science 1. A group of software products packaged and sold
together, usually having a consistent look and feel, a common
installation, and shared macros. 2. A group of procedures that work
cooperatively: The TCP/IP suite of protocols includes FTP and Telnet

In article
,
Mike wrote:

On Feb 5, 8:28*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Thinking is not activity that suites you very well.

Apparently, thinking doesn't "suite" you very well either.

Snip

Images of self-superiority often have a way of clouding intellect. As
usual, Telamon's images of self-superiority provide a delightfully
ironic twist.

Mikey top posting is a clueless behavior. I fixed it for you in this
reply.

You are imagining these "images of self-superiority." They only exist
for you. I'm just a regular guy. I don't think I'm some superior male.
This is what most people call projection. You take an attitude inside
yourself and project it upon someone or something else. This is how
media like ink blots are used. They are just a random shapes that look
like something to you.

You see it is you that has the "image of self-superiority." It's
something you tried to projected onto me.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

You see it is you that has the "image of self-superiority." It's
something you tried to projected onto me.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Uh, OK, Telly.

I can see, by your broken grammar, that this has gone far enough.

Get some rest, man.

MWBRYANT

In article
,
Mike wrote:


You see it is you that has the "image of self-superiority." It's
something you tried to projected onto me.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Uh, OK, Telly.

I can see, by your broken grammar, that this has gone far enough.

Get some rest, man.

Same to you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Feb 6, 6:43*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*Mike wrote:

You see it is you that has the "image of self-superiority." It's
something you tried to projected onto me.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Uh, OK, Telly.

I can see, by your broken grammar, that this has gone far enough.

Get some rest, man.

Same to you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Ok Fellas that's Enough Entertainment for Today
. . . Same Time Tomorrow - see ya ~ RHF

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Thinking is not activity that suites you very well.

Apparently, thinking doesn't "suite" you very well either.

Apparently you don't think at all.

If I've told you once, I've told you (politely) a dozen times: If you
are going to ridicule someone else's intelligence, please make sure your
own house is in order first. Otherwise, *you* end up looking quite the
fool.

I'm not interested in lectures from you. You seem to express great
ignorance on any subject you post about.

I'm surprised that a person of your obviously superior intellect is
clueless enough to not get that simple point. :-(

Snip

Sorry about the extra "e" that got you all in a rage but I don't have
an editor to review my posts for spelling and grammar errors.

You have made mistakes yourself and I find it pointless to bring them to
your attention due to your clueless nature. In other words you have
bigger problems than spelling and grammar. Consequently if typos is all
you can find wrong with what I post I must be doing pretty good. Thanks
for the insight.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:


I don't have an editor to review my posts for spelling and grammar
errors.

Well now, that's exactly the point, isn't it? Particularly when someone
like you who claims a superior intellect is ridiculing the intelligence
of others, one would think you would be -very- and especially careful of
spelling or typos before you hit that 'send' key. Otherwise, it leads
people to question -your- supposed 'superior' intelligence.

By virtue of my having to explain that to you yet again demonstrates
that -you- are indeed living in the land of the clueless.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

By virtue of my having to explain that to you yet again demonstrates
that -you- are indeed living in the land of the clueless.

"Mississippi" for short.

On Feb 6, 5:24*am, David wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
- - By virtue of my having to explain that to you
- - yet again demonstrates that -you- are indeed
- - living in the land of the clueless.

- "Mississippi" for short.

Dang - David how does putting down the good people of
the State of Mi$$i$$ippi elevate your status in life any ?

david - they are us ~ RHF