"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Doesn't matter, oh faux one. Thing is, folks learned that they no
longer wanted
you around as you're a damn pedantic piece of crap.

I am really happy that you are finally recognizing your superiors.

How so?

You
will be much happier once you accept the stature of your station in
life.

My station is pretty damn good.

I doubt that a lot. You live off the dole.

Nah, I get Social Security Disability (I paid into that), and I get my
Union
Pension (I paid into that), and I get my company pension (I paid into
that).

The Social Security disability you did not pay into. The thing you pay into
is for retirement benefits at age 62 to 66. .

Pensions are a product of company policies and union demands and threats.
You, yourself, did not earn them sich as present day workers earn the money
theyput in their 401-k plans.

Whatever, it still sounds like very little money.

Keep blowing those beans out your sorry, un-american ass, boy.


It's likely my taxes that pay your benefits from the government, as SSI and
SS payments come from general funds; it's not like they were separately kept
in special accounts.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Doesn't matter, oh faux one. Thing is, folks learned that they no
longer wanted
you around as you're a damn pedantic piece of crap.

I am really happy that you are finally recognizing your superiors.

How so?

You
will be much happier once you accept the stature of your station in
life.

My station is pretty damn good.

I doubt that a lot. You live off the dole.

Nah, I get Social Security Disability (I paid into that), and I get my
Union
Pension (I paid into that), and I get my company pension (I paid into
that).

The Social Security disability you did not pay into.

And once again, you are wrong.

The thing you pay into
is for retirement benefits at age 62 to 66. .

No, not necessarily.



Pensions are a product of company policies and union demands and threats.
You, yourself, did not earn them sich as present day workers earn the money
theyput in their 401-k plans.

Whatever, it still sounds like very little money.

I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!



Keep blowing those beans out your sorry, un-american ass, boy.


It's likely my taxes that pay your benefits from the government, as SSI and
SS payments come from general funds; it's not like they were separately kept
in special accounts.

And my taxes paid for those who went before me.

Get with it, retard boy.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!

You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.


And my taxes paid for those who went before me.

If all you saved is the amount stated, you did not pay much in takes for
anyone.

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!

You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.






If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!

You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.


If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

'Headquarters' is probably as clueless as he is!

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!
You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.
If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

'Headquarters' is probably as clueless as he is!


Likely. But they will have image priorities that have to be attended
to.

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!
You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.
If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

'Headquarters' is probably as clueless as he is!


Likely. But they will have image priorities that have to be attended
to.

That's the corporate way!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


'Headquarters' is probably as clueless as he is!


In the case of the company I work for, "headquarters" and "my office" are
synonymous.

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

When you don't have a valid argument, you always resort to threats. You have
done this several times before.

The fact is that I do not condone illegal immigration, but do believe in a
program to convert long term illegal residents into legal ones. I also
believe that new regulations and enforcement should be put in place for the
future.

In other jobs, the restrictions from union work rules has made
competitiveness, innovation and technical advancement suffer. I have seen
the same in many US industries, which have fled out of necessity to other
nations.

As to Mr. Lare, his comments to others and to me convinces me that he is a
subsistence level misanthrope who tries to divert attention from himself by
insulting others. And that's without analyzing his overt homophobia, which
surely masks an even darker side to his personality.

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

When you don't have a valid argument, you always resort to threats. You have
done this several times before.



And when you don't have a valid argument, you resort to evasion,
change of subject, semantics, and/or pedantry. You do this alot.

There. Feel better, now?



The fact is that I do not condone illegal immigration, but do believe in a
program to convert long term illegal residents into legal ones.


So, the ones who have been illegal the longest, should be rewarded
with citizenship?

Got it.


I also
believe that new regulations and enforcement should be put in place for the
future.


And what would you like to see embraced by those regulations and
enforcements.....




In other jobs, the restrictions from union work rules has made
competitiveness, innovation and technical advancement suffer. I have seen
the same in many US industries, which have fled out of necessity to other
nations.


And there we have change-of-suject. What's the matter, uncomfortable
admitting that Steve may actually have paid into the programs he claims?

Or do you just get bored easily, and decide to take the discussion to
a different subject where your ready rants are drop-in fits.




As to Mr. Lare, his comments to others and to me convinces me that he is a
subsistence level misanthrope who tries to divert attention from himself by
insulting others. And that's without analyzing his overt homophobia, which
surely masks an even darker side to his personality.


I've been in this group as long as Steve Lare. Perhaps longer. What
I've not seen is him diverting attention by resorting to insults. He
resorts to insults in response to insults.

Historically, you and the others on Steve's ****list had been more
than graciously insulting before he fired his first response.

You can't claim the high ground in the insult game. You've been more
than insulting, not only to Steve, but to all of us, since your first
appearance. You can't cry foul when your argument is 'He hit me back first."

As for Steve's homophobia....well, I'm reasonably certain that he's
not afraid of anything. Let along homosexuals. Not believing in their
lifestyle is not a phobia. Not liking them as individuals is not a phobia.

Nice try, there, Pancho. Now, we can add 'loaded language' to your
list of 'valid arguments.'