Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I saved up over the years. I'm comfortable! You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me. 3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month. And who ever said I was always earning 3-4% That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are concerned with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in about 6 to 8 years. You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one! Had you gone to school, graduated, etc., you might have actually learned something. As it is (and was) you've faked everything! Not really. Yes, really. Yeah, but you don't live in Michigan. Because I would hate to. No one to blow? You live in a place where even Ed McMann goes broke. No, not everyone. Just those who live beyond their means. Or those who are on the dole. Well, you certainly seem to wish that you were, oh faux one. I'm hoping they deport your pedantic ass! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are concerned with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in about 6 to 8 years. You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one! You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account by something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done. Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT investments or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting problems they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are concerned with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in about 6 to 8 years. You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one! You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account by something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done. Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT investments or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting problems they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now. You've not a clue as to what you're talking about, dropout! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are concerned with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in about 6 to 8 years. You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one! You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account by something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done. Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT investments or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting problems they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now. You've not a clue as to what you're talking about, dropout! So you are saying one or more of the following is true: 1. You can take more than 3% to 4% of savings and retain present value of the capital (in other words, adjusted for inflation). 2. Inflation does not have to be accounted for in the ongoing worth of capital. 3. You can make an inflation and tax adjusted 7% over the last 18 months Which is it (or "are they") as you may have invented a new school of economics. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are concerned with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in about 6 to 8 years. You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one! You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account by something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done. Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT investments or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting problems they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now. You've not a clue as to what you're talking about, dropout! So you are saying one or more of the following is true: 1. You can take more than 3% to 4% of savings and retain present value of the capital (in other words, adjusted for inflation). 2. Inflation does not have to be accounted for in the ongoing worth of capital. 3. You can make an inflation and tax adjusted 7% over the last 18 months Which is it (or "are they") as you may have invented a new school of economics. One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school! What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable knowledge of economics and investments. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why haven't we heard from Eduardo, the master IBOC-shill? | Shortwave | |||
Doug Myrland: man-woman IBOC-shill | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
NEW IBOC THREAD...Is Eduardo a profit? | Shortwave |