On 6/8/2011 4:28 PM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/8/2011 6:55 PM, John Smith wrote:


Interesting new tact

That would probably be "tack", O Wise One:

"tact (t²kt) n. 1. Acute sensitivity to what is proper and
appropriate in dealing with others, including the ability to
speak or act without offending."

"tack1 (t²k) n. ...
1. Nautical. a. To change the direction or course of a
vessel: ready to tack on the captain's signal. b. To change
tack: The ship tacked to starboard. 2. To change one's
course of action. [Middle English tak, fastener, from Old
North French taque, probably of Germanic origin.]"

If not, thanks for the compliment.

, you have tossed in, agree with what I am pointing
out and, yet, claim it is differing ... still, just a version of the
strawman argument ... how limited ...

Do you have the faintest idea what you think you're talking
about?

You mean, you are still unaware that, the courses (directions for you)
of your text appear to take the paths of a drunken sailor walking them?
Zigzags, circles, tangents, etc.?

Dream on ... it is plain to see ...


John... You made a mistake. Admit it and move on.


ROFLOL!

The truth, is never a mistake ... tact = tangents = circles, etc.
Simply course and directions in the travels of others obfuscations and
disinformation ... and the text establishing them ...

Your whole focus in on religion and mistakes ... whether real of only
perceived ...

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry