Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CW" wrote in message ... The current situation has nothing to do with keeping stations on the air. Keeping stations on the air was one of the justifications for the telecommunications act of 1996. The National Association of Broadcasters says: "Today, the industry has rebounded financially but, just 10 years ago, 60 percent of stations were losing money. Many stations had gone off the air, depriving communities of the local service upon which they had come to rely." This if from: http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro...tatement.shtml I prefered the old rules. It has everything to do with who is paying off the politicians. Our government is, for the most part, for sale to the highest bidder. That's another can 'o worms. The voting public doesn't pay much attention to what their representives are up to. I stumbled across a local public radio show in which each of candidates in our upcoming governor's race will be interviewed. Each candidate on the ballot gets a one hour interview. The interviewer seems well informed and asks the right questions. It's repeated several times. And it will have far less impact than a big money misleading political media campaign. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Has shortwave got a future? | Broadcasting | |||
I wonder... | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General |