Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The fact that they would explore the legality of this in public says
to me that this is a trial balloon or perhaps a ''your mother's on the roof'' gambit. Either way, it's an engraved invitation to some hooligan to make trouble, being publicised like this. Seems a tad suspicious on a couple levels. Not fully passing the stink test... On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:52:15 -0400, dxAce wrote: DXZoner wrote: From Reuters today, in Newsweek tomorrow. Bush administration's homeland securtity Dept, wants the "New Election Assistance Commision" [est 2002] to find a way to suspend the Nov. election in, case of an attack by the Boogie Man, Al-CIA-da or any other reason they can come up with. http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=5637434 Makes sense to me. Steps would indeed need to be taken if an attack were to occur within a few days of or on election day itself. And, it would depend upon the nature of the attack. Keep drinkin' that Kool-Aid. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: The fact that they would explore the legality of this in public says to me that this is a trial balloon or perhaps a ''your mother's on the roof'' gambit. Either way, it's an engraved invitation to some hooligan to make trouble, being publicised like this. Seems a tad suspicious on a couple levels. Not fully passing the stink test... You must buy it by the barrel... Read the article... it makes sense. Lets say there are chemical attacks all over, or a nuclear attack on election day, do you really think it makes sense to have an election that day? Crap, if that all happened that day, the election went as planned, and GWB won, you Kool-Aid drinkers would have a **** fit and want to have the election all over. Damn, you folks are ignorant. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The election could be called at that time and no one wouldn't
understand. That's just plain common sense. The fact they're thinking out loud says something beyond that. On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:12:00 -0400, dxAce wrote: David wrote: The fact that they would explore the legality of this in public says to me that this is a trial balloon or perhaps a ''your mother's on the roof'' gambit. Either way, it's an engraved invitation to some hooligan to make trouble, being publicised like this. Seems a tad suspicious on a couple levels. Not fully passing the stink test... You must buy it by the barrel... Read the article... it makes sense. Lets say there are chemical attacks all over, or a nuclear attack on election day, do you really think it makes sense to have an election that day? Crap, if that all happened that day, the election went as planned, and GWB won, you Kool-Aid drinkers would have a **** fit and want to have the election all over. Damn, you folks are ignorant. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: The election could be called at that time and no one wouldn't understand. That's just plain common sense. The fact they're thinking out loud says something beyond that. Yeah, you just listen to the voices in your head don't you? Frickin' Kool-Aid drinker. Flush............. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
read and weep Woger ...and the belgrade bastard | General | |||
read and weep Woger ...and the belgrade bastard | Policy | |||
Read and Weep, Damn | Shortwave | |||
Read it and WEEP!!! | Policy |