"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
oups.com...
I don't suppose you have a schematic of that available on the web. It
would be neat to see.

Steveo wrote in
I have a dumpster full.

Slow Code wrote:
You being a typical clueless CB'er and not able to understand schematics,
it's only natural your dumb ass would toss them in a dumpster.

LOL... how right you are SC. What chance does a guy who admits making
his living in agriculture know about reading a schematic. Absolutely
hilarious...

And you are doing what? Updating old Motorola bulletins, and building
electronic turn signal flashers that don't fit half of today's vehicles, and
most that it does fit are antiques. Yeah, big demand for you! ROTFLMMFAO!!!

"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
oups.com...
I don't suppose you have a schematic of that available on the web. It
would be neat to see.

Steveo wrote in
I have a dumpster full.

Slow Code wrote:
You being a typical clueless CB'er and not able to understand schematics,
it's only natural your dumb ass would toss them in a dumpster.

LOL... how right you are SC. What chance does a guy who admits making
his living in agriculture know about reading a schematic. Absolutely
hilarious...

And you make a living breaking federal law.

On 16 Sep 2006 17:12:45 -0700, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
om:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
snip
And -that-, dear Brian, is MY design.

Frank, you're hopeless...


Gee, you sure told -me-, huh?

Go away.

Slow Code wrote:
Steveo wrote in

slow code stalker at large

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:26:40 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:

+++
+++"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
legroups.com...
+++ I don't suppose you have a schematic of that available on the web. It
+++ would be neat to see.
+++
+++ Steveo wrote in
+++ I have a dumpster full.
+++
+++ Slow Code wrote:
+++ You being a typical clueless CB'er and not able to understand schematics,
+++ it's only natural your dumb ass would toss them in a dumpster.
+++
+++ LOL... how right you are SC. What chance does a guy who admits making
+++ his living in agriculture know about reading a schematic. Absolutely
+++ hilarious...
+++
+++And you make a living breaking federal law.
+++
************

I was wondering when someone would mention this. I do seem to remember
a clause in part 95 and/or in 97 that talks about the manufacture of
amplifiers in the range of 25 to 50 MHz. I guess I must go back and
review these to regulatory documents and determine if the FCC has
recended some previous rules.

james

On 15 Sep 2006 16:06:39 -0700, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote:

+++http://www.telstar-electronics.com/img_0003.jpg
************

I must say the amp does look pretty with all that solder mask and sild
screen. I can agree that it does make it look professional. Most amps
I have seen have been without solder mask and silk screen.

I can't see why one would do that. The solder mask and silk screen has
to be a significant cost adder. I would think that one would not go to
that expense for such low production levels. Besides tin plate over 2
oz copper is significant for amplifiers. That is 2 oz copper on the
boards I hope?

james

"james" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:26:40 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:

+++
+++"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
glegroups.com...
+++ I don't suppose you have a schematic of that available on the
web. It
+++ would be neat to see.
+++
+++ Steveo wrote in
+++ I have a dumpster full.
+++
+++ Slow Code wrote:
+++ You being a typical clueless CB'er and not able to understand
schematics,
+++ it's only natural your dumb ass would toss them in a dumpster.
+++
+++ LOL... how right you are SC. What chance does a guy who admits making
+++ his living in agriculture know about reading a schematic. Absolutely
+++ hilarious...
+++
+++And you make a living breaking federal law.
+++
************

I was wondering when someone would mention this. I do seem to remember
a clause in part 95 and/or in 97 that talks about the manufacture of
amplifiers in the range of 25 to 50 MHz. I guess I must go back and
review these to regulatory documents and determine if the FCC has
recended some previous rules.

james

They have not. A licensed ham can manufacture one per year that operates
without modification in this bandwidth (26-30Mhz). Real commercial amp
manufacturers require proof of license before they will divulge the mod
procedures to make one operate on 10 meters, or sell the kit to make it
operate there.

james wrote:
I must say the amp does look pretty with all that solder mask and sild
screen. I can agree that it does make it look professional. Most amps
I have seen have been without solder mask and silk screen.

I can't see why one would do that. The solder mask and silk screen has
to be a significant cost adder. I would think that one would not go to
that expense for such low production levels. Besides tin plate over 2
oz copper is significant for amplifiers. That is 2 oz copper on the
boards I hope?

James, I take no shortcuts. I give my customers the best in quality and
reliability.

www.telstar-electronics.com

U-Know-Who wrote:
And you are doing what? Updating old Motorola bulletins, and building
electronic turn signal flashers that don't fit half of today's vehicles, and
most that it does fit are antiques. Yeah, big demand for you! ROTFLMMFAO!!!

Thanks for visiting my web site...

www.telstar-electronics.com

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Let's put it this way, Brian: Ampheads don't care if their signal is
clean or not, just BIG and LOUD. They don't care about biasing or
linearity or thermal protection.... on the contrary, most of them
actually -brag- when they blow a pill or smoke a resistor.

Frank, you seem to have a very low opinion of CBers... then why do you
seem to gravitate to this NG? What business could you possibly have
here with these CBers you loathe?... LOL

www.telstar-electronics.com