Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
Okay, then how about this: I'll buy one of those antennas, and if it doesn't perform as well or better than a 9' whip then you agree to buy it from me for the price I paid plus shipping. After all, if the antenna is as good as you say it is then you shouldn't have any problem reselling it, right? So? I said these posts have been direct. So I guess I'll continue. I don't trust much of anything about you. NO |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
Okay, then how about this: I'll buy one of those antennas, and if it doesn't perform as well or better than a 9' whip then you agree to buy it from me for the price I paid plus shipping. After all, if the antenna is as good as you say it is then you shouldn't have any problem reselling it, right? So? I said these posts have been direct. So I guess I'll continue. I don't trust much of anything about you. NO Well you sure don't seem too willing to put your money where your mouth is...... I already did. I bought the antennas. are you so financially strapped that you can't afford to take the risk on someone who has not only bought and sold radios in this newsgroup without any complaints, but has also sent free parts to some on occasion? Who's financially strapped? Or is my identity so obscured that you think I'll disappear into the shadows with your precious antenna, never to be heard from again? As you said " put your money where your mouth is...... " Naw, you're just making excuses because you are afraid of an objective test of your antenna. I'm suprised you didn't try to pre-empt my offer by suggesting that the results of any test I make will be biased, but then again you are kinda slow..... A test coming from you would be suspect, but it doesn't matter because you'll never do the test anyway. Final offer: You find someone in my area with one of your antennas and we'll go test them up on the plains. The testing will be monitored by your volunteer so there will be no doubt about the results. Then I'll post the results in the newsgroup. How 'bout it, tnom? Final offer..........Put your money where your mouth is. Oh, I forgot. You are financially strapped. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:40:17 -0500, wrote in
: Okay, then how about this: I'll buy one of those antennas, and if it doesn't perform as well or better than a 9' whip then you agree to buy it from me for the price I paid plus shipping. After all, if the antenna is as good as you say it is then you shouldn't have any problem reselling it, right? So? I said these posts have been direct. So I guess I'll continue. I don't trust much of anything about you. NO Well you sure don't seem too willing to put your money where your mouth is...... I already did. I bought the antennas. are you so financially strapped that you can't afford to take the risk on someone who has not only bought and sold radios in this newsgroup without any complaints, but has also sent free parts to some on occasion? Who's financially strapped? Or is my identity so obscured that you think I'll disappear into the shadows with your precious antenna, never to be heard from again? As you said " put your money where your mouth is...... " I offered to send you a deposit and I offered to buy one. Not suprisingly, you refused. Naw, you're just making excuses because you are afraid of an objective test of your antenna. I'm suprised you didn't try to pre-empt my offer by suggesting that the results of any test I make will be biased, but then again you are kinda slow..... A test coming from you would be suspect, but it doesn't matter because you'll never do the test anyway. Gee, another soothsayer. Did you inherit Dave Hall's crystal ball? Final offer: You find someone in my area with one of your antennas and we'll go test them up on the plains. The testing will be monitored by your volunteer so there will be no doubt about the results. Then I'll post the results in the newsgroup. How 'bout it, tnom? Final offer..........Put your money where your mouth is. Oh, I forgot. You are financially strapped. No, I'm financially responsible. That means I'm not willing to risk my money on antennas based on purported claims of subjective tests from a single source that can't explain why the results don't obey the laws of physics. If you did then that's your problem, but don't expect me to be as foolish with -my- money as you are with yours. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
No, I'm financially responsible. That means I'm not willing to risk my money on antennas based on purported claims of subjective tests from a single source that can't explain why the results don't obey the laws of physics. If you did then that's your problem, but don't expect me to be as foolish with -my- money as you are with yours. Put your money where your mouth is. Stop asking for a handout. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:40:34 -0500, wrote in
: No, I'm financially responsible. That means I'm not willing to risk my money on antennas based on purported claims of subjective tests from a single source that can't explain why the results don't obey the laws of physics. If you did then that's your problem, but don't expect me to be as foolish with -my- money as you are with yours. Put your money where your mouth is. Stop asking for a handout. I offered to buy one of these antenna on the condition that you will buy it from me -IF- it doesn't perform as well or better than a 9' RS whip as per your alleged test results. If you had -any- confidence in your test results then there is absolutely no risk on your part, the financial 'burden' would be mine, and I would end up with a pretty good antenna (according to you). So how is that "asking for a handout"? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:04:47 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:40:34 -0500, wrote in : No, I'm financially responsible. That means I'm not willing to risk my money on antennas based on purported claims of subjective tests from a single source that can't explain why the results don't obey the laws of physics. If you did then that's your problem, but don't expect me to be as foolish with -my- money as you are with yours. Put your money where your mouth is. Stop asking for a handout. I offered to buy one of these antenna on the condition that you will buy it from me -IF- it doesn't perform as well or better than a 9' RS whip as per your alleged test results. If you had -any- confidence in your test results then there is absolutely no risk on your part, the financial 'burden' would be mine, and I would end up with a pretty good antenna (according to you). So how is that "asking for a handout"? I might get cooties if I deal with you. Buy your own antenna. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave |