Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#291
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net...
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote | I will simply start to "kill-file" the | offending parties' posts. | | 73, | Carl - wk3c It works wonders, Carl. Since implementing a disciplined screening protocol the noise level has dropped about 30dB here. Same here, Hans Most of the messages I see actually pertain to amateur radio policy. Speaking of which, it now becomes apparent why your are waiting for the right time to send your proposal to FCC. The others proposals are functioning as "warm up acts" to your "main event". Cool. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
"William" wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... I only need one finger to tap on the key with! Dee and all the FISTS club members will come on here and tell you that you don't tap on the key with one finger. Actually I would have said you don't even need one. In an emergency, just about any part of the anatomy could be used. This is independent of what the normal operating practice might be. Besides that one could easily build a key designed around the principle of being tapped if desired. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:08:33 -0400, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote: "William" wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... I only need one finger to tap on the key with! Dee and all the FISTS club members will come on here and tell you that you don't tap on the key with one finger. Actually I would have said you don't even need one. In an emergency, just about any part of the anatomy could be used. This is independent of what the normal operating practice might be. This was first proposed in a book that I saw at a hamfest a while back - it was titled "Handsfree Telegraphy - The Dick Bash Method" Besides that one could easily build a key designed around the principle of being tapped if desired. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE 73, Leo |
#294
|
|||
|
|||
I only need one finger to tap on the key with! Dee and all the FISTS club members will come on here and tell you that you don't tap on the key with one finger. Actually I would have said you don't even need one. In an emergency, just about any part of the anatomy could be used. This is independent of what the normal operating practice might be. This was first proposed in a book that I saw at a hamfest a while back - it was titled "Handsfree Telegraphy - The Dick Bash Method" Leo ...... Sort of a new twist on the old "Bananna Boat Swing" 73 Tom KI3R |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:47:20 GMT, "garigue"
wrote: I only need one finger to tap on the key with! Dee and all the FISTS club members will come on here and tell you that you don't tap on the key with one finger. Actually I would have said you don't even need one. In an emergency, just about any part of the anatomy could be used. This is independent of what the normal operating practice might be. This was first proposed in a book that I saw at a hamfest a while back - it was titled "Handsfree Telegraphy - The Dick Bash Method" Leo ...... Sort of a new twist on the old "Bananna Boat Swing" It sure is! I suspect that most of the folks that I have subjected to my 5-or-so-WPM code firmly believe that I learned from this book..... 73 Tom KI3R 73, Leo |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Jim:
I haven't been watching the newsgroups as much myself....... When there is less than 5% of actual good debate/discussion on a topic (no matter how risque it is) it is not worth my time to wade through the arguments. I have had a schedule change which doesn't allow me the flexibility to respond like I used to. Than and pursuing Fire Officer 1,2,3 and yet another Associates and Bachelor degrees, my time is severely limited. I do miss some of the debates/discussions of the past. Let's see what topics of policy or procedure we can actually discuss, without fighting about it..... Ryan KC8PMX I believe that a lot of good folks, like Ed Hare, for one ... aren't around any more because they got sick of wading through all of the extraneous crap ... our "community" here is worse off for the loss of such folks' contributions to the *real* discussions, and it's a shame ... I agree 100%, Carl. So what should folks like you and I do about it? In particular, when someone posts information that is flat out wrong, should we simply ignore it or challenge it? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Ryan, KC8PMX"
writes: Jim: I haven't been watching the newsgroups as much myself....... When there is less than 5% of actual good debate/discussion on a topic (no matter how risque it is) it is not worth my time to wade through the arguments. Agreed, Ryan. I have found it very effective to either killfile the worst offenders, or simply skim until the general tone of the post becomes apparent. Often it's clear from the first line that a post isn;t worth my time. I have had a schedule change which doesn't allow me the flexibility to respond like I used to. I use AutoAol, which downloads email and newsgroup posts so I can respond at leisure and save or delete as desired. Doesn't tie up the phone line and deletions are almost instantaneous. Than and pursuing Fire Officer 1,2,3 and yet another Associates and Bachelor degrees, my time is severely limited. Good luck on your continuing education. I do miss some of the debates/discussions of the past. Let's see what topics of policy or procedure we can actually discuss, without fighting about it..... How about this one: "Is it a good idea to have an class of license that does not allow homebrewing-from-scratch? Canada and the UK have such a class". 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
N2EY wrote:
Agreed, Ryan. I have found it very effective to either killfile the worst offenders, or simply skim until the general tone of the post becomes apparent. Often it's clear from the first line that a post isn;t worth my time. I find the group much more pleasent and interesting since I started ignoring posts by lenny the lame, steveie the stupid, and wee willie winkie. |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote:
N2EY wrote: Agreed, Ryan. I have found it very effective to either killfile the worst offenders, or simply skim until the general tone of the post becomes apparent. Often it's clear from the first line that a post isn;t worth my time. I find the group much more pleasent and interesting since I started ignoring posts by lenny the lame, steveie the stupid, and wee willie winkie. You read every one of my posts, kid dyno-mite. |
#300
|
|||
|
|||
In article , JJ
writes: N2EY wrote: Agreed, Ryan. I have found it very effective to either killfile the worst offenders, or simply skim until the general tone of the post becomes apparent. Often it's clear from the first line that a post isn;t worth my time. I find the group much more pleasent and interesting since I started ignoring posts by lenny the lame, steveie the stupid, and wee willie winkie. No call = No ham. No JJ = No problem. LHA / WMD |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Extra class - question about the test | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
1x2 Calls--automatic when upgrading to Extra? | Policy |