Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: "N2EY" wrote in message ... [snip] The important question is, who is the best judge of what the requirements should be? The newcomer or the experienced ham? That is the very crux of the problem. Somehow too many have lost sight of the fact that those with experience should be the ones to define the requirements. Territorial Imperative! Turf! Mama Dee has TOLD US "children!" What she say be da Law! :-) Dee, so many of "you" have lost sight of the fact that amateur radio was not created in your images nor do "you" have all the power to take over the playing field. Sorry to subvert your endeavor to "take charge here," but there is no emergency requiring what is tantamount to martial law by "the experienced." If "the experienced" had their power, hams would all be beeping away on HF with no voice privileges and the VHF and above bands would be non-existant ("only real hams use morse on HF"). "The Bands" would remain in stasis of the 1920s and not advance much at all. Why do you wish to subvert democratic principles when it comes to the hobby of ham radio? LHA / WMD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |