About Us

July 18th 04, 12:00 AM

In article , (Steve
Stalker, Ethnic Cleanser Exxtra) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: (William)
Date: 7/16/2004 5:23 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(N2EY) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public
safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.

It's not "just a hobby".

It is for most of the participants.

And you have deduced this from WHAT valid research?

But even if it were, what's the difference? If something is "just a
hobby",
does that mean there should be no standards, no training, no rules?

The FCC does not mandate training, does not mandate operating. It
simply has a mechanism in place for VEC's to examine applicants, for
the issuance and renewal of licenses, publication of regulations, and
rarely issues a citation.

The FCC DOES mandate "training"...IF you want a license you will have
to participate in a certain amount of training...

Name the Part numbers. Cite the language of this "mandate."

C'mon, Stalker, you are Mandate the Magician, show us your tricks.

The FCC does not run contests, sprints, DXCC, field days, or nets.

Whoa! Brain woke up for a few minutes!

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need.

When did it cease, Len?

"long ago"

When did it cease Brian? Back when you were operating from Somalia?

Before that. :-) Before the First Gulf War, in fact.

Or was it when unlicensed devices started playing a "major role" in
"emergency comms"...?!?!

Twenty years ago, cellular telephony was just beginning and only a
few were installed, mainly in vehicles. Now there are millions and
one American in three has a cell phone subscription.

Not only that, FRS HTs (all unlicensed) are a regular consumer
electronics market item for $50 or less a pair.

CB has been there for over 40 years and may number 5 million or
so in the USA now.

And here's a fun fact: The Basis and Purpose never used the phrase
"experienced
morse operators". Just "experienced operators" - no mention of modes.

So the Basis and Purpose never emphasized (favored) one mode over
another.

Wonder where that come from?

Why would you wonder?

It's been almos the same language as long as I have been licensed.

You have "licensure" mister fancy legal pro. :-)

Since when was nursie admitted to a bar? Legal bar, that is.

The nation does NOT need morse operators, haven't for a long time.

How long?

"a long time"

PuppetBoy strikes again.

Jim, did you realize that a code exam is a disincentive to CW use?

Brain, did you know there are people on 6 and 2 meters USING Morse Code
who DIDN'T take an FCC test to do so...?!?!

Call Riley Hollingsworth! Untested, unlicensed PIRATES on the
ham bands!!!

Make your call, big mental health pro, have them COMMITTED!

You can do it! [you haven't done it on me or Brian, though]

Get tough! [tougher] Show them all who is BOSS! :-)

Arf Arf!! Yell Yell!!

LHA / WMD

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test)	N2EY	Policy	6	December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC	Brian	Policy	3	October 24th 03 12:02 AM
Amateur Radio NewslineÃ¢â€žÂ¢ Report 1366 Ã‚Â October 17 2003	Radionews	Dx	0	October 17th 03 06:51 PM
Low reenlistment rate	charlesb	Policy	54	September 18th 03 01:57 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement.	Keith	Policy	1	July 31st 03 03:46 AM

Menu

About Us