| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
October 12th 04, 09:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (William) Date: 10/11/2004 7:33 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I want others to condemn his despicable behavio[u]r; the homosexual and pedophile inuendo, and the suggestion that if you don't agree with him that bricks may fly, tires may be slashed, and wives may be terrorized. Only *his* despicable behaviour? What about similar despicable behaviour by others? Or are they immune, for some reason? Deiter says "one spammer at a time." I like that plan. I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who's making threats, Brain. Please quote the post wherein someone made a threat. Any objections? Sounds like a bit of arrogant defiance. Brain, are you finally getting a spine of your OWN...??? Steve, K4YZ |
|
#4
October 15th 04, 04:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. |
|
#5
October 15th 04, 11:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" |
|
#6
October 15th 04, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (Quitefine) Date: 10/15/2004 5:24 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" You forgot to remind Brainless who uttered THOSE words. Or did you do it just to keep from breaking his heart? Steve, K4YZ |
|
#7
October 15th 04, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. |
|
#8
October 15th 04, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
William wrote:
(Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. So it is okay to "threaten" another as long as they were "threatened"? Quite frankly Brian. If anyone threatened me in here, legitimately and identifiably, I would be to the proper authorities so quickly that the person threatening me would know about it in a few minutes. Otherwise why waste the time? And that is Quitethetruth! - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#9
October 16th 04, 04:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
William wrote: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. So it is okay to "threaten" another as long as they were "threatened"? Mike, I merely asked for a -complete- list. Quite frankly Brian. If anyone threatened me in here, legitimately and identifiably, I would be to the proper authorities so quickly that the person threatening me would know about it in a few minutes. Otherwise why waste the time? And that is Quitethetruth! - Mike KB3EIA - Quiteright. |
|
#10
October 16th 04, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: Mike Coslo Date: 10/15/2004 2:59 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: William wrote: Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. So it is okay to "threaten" another as long as they were "threatened"? Quite frankly Brian. If anyone threatened me in here, legitimately and identifiably, I would be to the proper authorities so quickly that the person threatening me would know about it in a few minutes. Otherwise why waste the time? And that is Quitethetruth! Of course no threat was made here, Mike. I related the happenings of another situation wherein a person had been harrassing an Internet group (not a USENET group, but similar...). The person, much like Lennie, made it a point of trying to be the King Of The Hill, used copious profanities, and just otherwise was a PITA. The news story related the efforts of the participants to get this creep off thier group, but even after he'd been booted from a couple different ISP's, he'd show up through a remailer or other anonymous posting. Unfortunately the participants took it upon themselves to strike back in the manner that I related herein. Of course Brainless and Sir Scummy said I was "threatening" them and "terrorizing" thier spouses. Brain will not be able to quote a post wherein I or any other person threatened him, his family, Lennie or his family in any way shape or form because it didn't happen. Brain flatters himself that I or any other person who even remotely disdains the idea of imprisonment would risk said imprisonment over him. He truly is one egocentric creep. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Back At Ya, Brain..... | Policy | |||
| Maybe THIS Time, Brain...?!?! | Policy | |||
| Why Can't Brain Just Say "Yes" Or "No"...?!?! | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
