Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Aug 25, 2:42 pm K4YZ wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: Just as they have not permitted you to comment about "amateur" radio because you hold no license, NoServers may not comment about the military. Hold on, Sparky. Len has commented here at great length and on many, many occasions. And what has Jim's response been to Len's comments? It has been quite varied and quite mild considering Len's typical insulting demeanor. What Jim hasn't done is to prevent or attempt to prevent Len from making those comments. The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon discrediting Len's comments and opinions. Correct. Questioning or discrediting is not what you claimed. What you said was that Len wasn't permitted to comment. You were incorrect. We were instructed to discard Len's comments. ...and you always follow instruction--right? And you always give instruction not to be followed--right? ...and you always follow instruction--right? ....right. In the end, if they cannot lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s)... I've seen any number of Len's comments made to look like the product of one who has little experience. As Len has questioned your net control capabilities. Net control capabilities? What in the world are you going on about? Opening and closing a RTTY net with CW. Hi! I've been involved in both as a radio amateur. Len wouldn't know anything about that. I've never been involved in either as a State Department employee. Len wouldn't know anything about that either. Calm down. ...they claim that his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham. Sometimes Len's opinions are no good because they are issued because he has no experience in amateur radio. Sometimes his opinions are no good because they are the rantings of a geezer with an ax to grind. Often, he makes factual errors and there have been numerous times when he deliberately fabricates. You want us to believe that all of Len's comments are to be discarded. I'd settle for 80-90%. About the same percentage as your commnets. Imagine that! No RTTY or CW State Department "commnets". Frustrated technical writer? David Heil/K8MN is a primary culprit in that tactic, but Jim has used it as well. Oh no, I've by no means been "a primary culprit", but I have participated over a period of years. Can you guess how many times you've commented that Len isn't an amateur radio operator? I didn't know there was going to be a quiz. There is always a quiz where your motives are concerned. I'm taking a whiz on your quiz. Lay off the branch water. It has to be fewer than the number of recountings of his ADA tale or his comments about FCC staffers don't need to hold amateur radio licenses. Are FCC staffers required to hold an amateur radio license in order to hold their positions? Are they paid for regulating amateur radio? Are DMV employees required to hold a driving license? Are DNR clerks mandated to have a hunting license? Do you understand any of this? FCC staffers - regulate amateur radio - receive a salary radio amateurs - participate in amateur radio - receive no salary Len Anderson - not a regulator or participant - receives no salary So people without licenses and least likely to know anything about anything are regulating our radio, our drivers, and people with guns??? There ought to be a law! Len isn't involved in amateur radio. He wraps himself in bunting and writes of his Constitutional rights of free speech and to petition his government. Well, he has done those things. Nothing on this planet can prevent me from lauging at him or ridiculing him or his ideas. Nor him you. That's where I came in. Len's been doing that almost since my first posts to this newsgroup in 1996. Congratulations on almost a century of posting meaningless drivel. A century, huh? That must be the new math. Sorry, Log -10 Len writes of being denigrated or insulted by those who do not agree with his him but he often insults and denigrates those who have the opposite point of view. Perhaps Len is correct to do so. The signs point to his not being correct. Please point out those "signs." Check under the Google sign. Take some Pepto Bismol first and be prepared to spend some time. I've seen plenty of name calling and denigration moving in Len's direction. Your point? He is quick to tell others that they are not discussing amateur radio policy, Get a clue, he's giving it back to you. He's been told that he is not an amateur radio operator and should be here. This is a place only of amateurs and amateur things. I don't think Len has ever been told that he should be here. :-) Typo. A *big* typo. "not" You really are a frustrated technical writer, aren't you? I'm neither frustrated nor a technical writer. I don't have the knack for making simple terms seem complex. Yet you have a knack to make simple typos into undecipherable passages. You should put your lack of talent to more useful purposes. Back to the subject. Really? You're going to lay waste to Frank of Silliland's silliness? Hi! Robeson is in hiding. Len has declared a several-decades-long "interest" in amateur radio. OK. I'm sure he feels better now that you've blessed the concept. There's nothing new there. I thought you were the guy that couldn't take the simple and make it complex. Yet you point out the plain and obvious and expect me to get excited. He's never been interested enough to even attempt passing a license exam. How do you know that? That's easy. He has told us so. OK. Len was going to go for an "Extra right out of the box" several years back. That hasn't happened. How do you know that? Another easy one. He has told us so. OK. That means you and the three other Morsemen are still safe from having to talk to him on the radio. Is there anything else? We have him declaring within the past few months that he has *no interest* in obtaining an amateur radio license. Tsk, tsk. What is one to believe? Perhaps he has tried and failed. Many people fail the tests. It is certainly possible for you to be correct. Do you think Len is fibbing about taking a test because he doesn't want to embarrass himself? I certainly thought that dysfunctional and illiterate Bruce was fibbing about having passed Extra on a lark, without studying, in under 7 minutes, with 100% correct, and winning a wager of $250. But I guess I was wrong. So after being so wrong with such a slam-dunk, I'd rather not venture a guess about Len. then he goes on a multi-post rant having everything to do with personalities and nothing to do with amateur radio. Have you ever thought of reigning in Robeson? Am I in charge of Steve's postings? Feel free to take on the job if you think it should be done. Yet you think that you are in charge of Anderson. You take it as a personal challenge to reign in Len's postings. I do? I've never told Len to shut up or to go away. I've countered him, challenged his assertions and ridiculed a number of his ideas. The word is "rein". Please forgive me. Why is that? It isn't. Hi! When you do, get back to me about Len and we'll talk some more. Howzzat? Did I suggest that it is up to you to control Len's bad behavior? Then end your decade-long griping about Len. Thanks, but no thanks. Learning theory fails. There's certainly no change in your behavio[u]r. Take your own advice and simply don't read it. You and others are free to ignore my advice. I feel free to ignore yours. And you your own. If it is worthless to you, why try to pawn it off on others? And don't start tail-ending someone elses comments as Jim has, in order to comment on Len's opinions. Hi! How about if I simply ignore your suggestions? There's certainly precedent for doing so. There certainly is. You, of course, are Len's little electrolytic acolyte. And you are the World Famous DXer that works out of band Frenchmen on 6 Meters. Well, I certainly operate on 6m, but always within the regs which govern my amateur radio operation. I don't control French radio amateurs any more than I'm responsible for Steve's posts. I'd prefer not to engage out of band Frenchmen on six meters... You are free to check the allocations of any country's radio amateurs before working them. You may quiz any foreign or domestic radio amateurs about whether they are outside their alloted bands or band segments. You may complain to any country's PTT if its amateurs call you outside their published allocations. I woulnd't encourage just anyone to do so but I feel that you need purpose in your life. "wouldn't" Lots of anger. ...and not to give Robeson a pass on his outrageous behavio[u]r by remaining silent. I don't control the postings of Steve Robeson. He is responsible for his own postings. I'm free to comment or not comment on them. You speak of them as outrageous. I feel that comments directed to Steve about his military service, border on outrageous. You have written some of them. Frank the CBer and Leonard Anderson have written others. Steve has repeatedly told me that if I can't show proof, then my claims didn't happen and that I'm a liar. I merely hold Steve to his own ethics. Tuff Love. I noticed that you made no comments about "Colonel" Mark Morgan's recent outrageous lies about me. Why is that? Did you see the quoted Google material which revealed his claims to be a lie? Aren't you, by your own standards, responsible for his posts? MARK! You bedda stop dat! Feel better? You, of course, will do both. I will operate under the regs imposed by my license. I will not take personal responsibility for newsgroup posts other than my own. Those are two things you'll have to live with. Dave K8MN I hope you won't mind me sharing. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
K8CPA Email | CB |