David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Keep dancing oh fraudulent one!


I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder.

You'd best stop guessing, boy.


Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a
conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on
what
inane statement you will post next.

Go for it...

Liar, liar, pantalunes on fire!

LMFAO at one of the most fraudulent individuals I've ever come across in
my 53
years on the planet.

Verdict: nobody laughed here in the conference room...Nice try.

Why of course! Nobody laughed, because nobody was there.

Get a clue, boy!

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Keep dancing oh fraudulent one!


I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder.

You'd best stop guessing, boy.


Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a
conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on
what
inane statement you will post next.

Go for it...

Please let me know who won the pool..

That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies.

Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud.

Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Feb 20, 7:42?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

Now, the whole world
knows who you are,

I have never hideen my name on Usenet... or even back to the BBS era on the
Well.

and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce !

There are already over 1000 HD FM's, and there are increasing numbers of
receivers. Nobody in the industry ever thought that the project would bear
short-term fruit (heck, the development started around 1991) so nobody in
the industry, today, thinks that HD is a farce. It is simply one tool in a
kit of many things radio has to do to remain viable.

AM, on the other hand, has bigger problems than whether HD will work... the
entire band, good stations and bad, is in rapid decline and the remaining
listeners are ageing.

This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are !

As I said, I dropped out to put my own radio station on the air in a large
market... a station that became #1 in its first few months on the air. I
must not have been too dumb, then.

"Desperately Seeking Good News for Radio Industry"

"Neither of these suggestions are easy to do. But if action isn't
taken to at least try, six months from know you're going to have an
even tougher road."

http://www.audiographics.com/agd/021907-1.htm

"Radio in the United States"

"FM radio, aided by the invention of ever smaller portable radios and
inexpensive "Walkman" headsets, dominates music programs, while AM has
shifted to "talk" and news formats. Barely in existence 25 years ago,
"talk radio," in which celebrities and experts from various fields
answer listener "call-in" questions and offer their advice on various
topics, has grown spectacularly in recent years. It has contributed to
the comeback of AM radio."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_in_the_United_States

Again, just a full-of-**** IBOC shill.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Verdict: nobody laughed here in the conference room...Nice try.

Why of course! Nobody laughed, because nobody was there.


Call the Houston Hobby Marriott and ask who is in the big meeting room
tonight... and tomorrow. There are 128 people here now. Of course, I would
not show your idiotic posts for our listeners... but you can kinda' get the
idea.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Keep dancing oh fraudulent one!


I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder.

You'd best stop guessing, boy.


Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a
conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on
what
inane statement you will post next.

Go for it...

Please let me know who won the pool..

That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies.

Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud.

Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination?

He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong?

wrote in message
oups.com...

"Radio in the United States"

"FM radio, aided by the invention of ever smaller portable radios and
inexpensive "Walkman" headsets, dominates music programs, while AM has
shifted to "talk" and news formats. Barely in existence 25 years ago,
"talk radio," in which celebrities and experts from various fields
answer listener "call-in" questions and offer their advice on various
topics, has grown spectacularly in recent years. It has contributed to
the comeback of AM radio."

That, of course, is a crock.

The fact is that talk formats are starting to migrate to FM, as witnessed by
the list I have posted several times.

AM talk formats existed all the way back in the 60's with hosts like Joe
Pyne and Bill Ballance. KABC in LA was #1 throughout the 70's with a news
and talk format, to give one example.

What restricted the growth of the format was both the lack of talent at the
local level and the Fairness Doctrine. When the deregulation of radio under
Reagan eliminated Fairness and did not require opposing viewpoints to be
granted equal time, talents like Rush Limbaugh developed and went national
via syndication.

AM shares, however, have declined every year since the late 60's when the
FCC mandated the end of AM/FM simulcasts. In 1977, the national FM share
passed the AM share, and now FM commands about 80% of all listening (each
market is a little different... some are less, like San Francisco, and
others are more, like Allentown).

Today, per Arbitron, AM shares below age 45 are in the single digits (that's
the sum of all AM stations in each market) and the bulk of AM listeners are
over 55... which in the rated markets means you can not sell this audience
segment.

There is no comeback of AM radio. AM shares, in Arbitron, are at the lowest
level ever. And the audience is ageing every year.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Verdict: nobody laughed here in the conference room...Nice try.

Why of course! Nobody laughed, because nobody was there.


Call the Houston Hobby Marriott and ask who is in the big meeting room
tonight... and tomorrow. There are 128 people here now. Of course, I would
not show your idiotic posts for our listeners... but you can kinda' get the
idea.

Yeah, I get the idea that you're a pathological liar!

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Keep dancing oh fraudulent one!


I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder.

You'd best stop guessing, boy.


Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a
conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on
what
inane statement you will post next.

Go for it...

Please let me know who won the pool..

That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies.

Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud.

Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination?

He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong?

But simply because you state that Mr. Cruz is with you doesn't necessarily mean
he's actually there!

LMFAO at the delusional 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Feb 20, 4:07 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

roups.com...

Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is
hardly an issue

Their only mistake was taking you at your word.

Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a
convention
has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many
errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought.

Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol

Hardly. Since most of the attendees already knew who the presnters were at
my session, I doubt most even noticed.

At most I suspect there were a few snickers from people who knew who
you really are.


The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos",
isn't it?

I have no idea what the reference you make is... we are talking about a
program (also available on the web) for the NAB convention several years ago
which had my title truncated... there was no article.

"Truncated". Yeah, you weren't lying. You were "truncating".




It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law.

You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen.

Under US law, she may be... you can see from the interesting infromation
from Mr. Gallagher that the issue is not balck and white. She was registered
as a US citizen at birth, she chose not to ever get either a US passport or
to pursue the citizenship otherwise. So, 40-some years later, she is
Ecuadorian.



Under
Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American
nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of
majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an
Ecuadorian
passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considered ONLY an Ecuadorian
national. US law saw her as a dual national.

Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and
exercising it are not the same.

Correct. As Mr Gallagher has pointed out, while another goverment may not
consider her a dual national, in many cases the US government does.


Correct. So, there's no point in continuing to lie about your
daughter's citizenship status.


"David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. "

Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she
did
not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country
considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual
national. In other words, there are two answers to this question,
depending
on whose laws you folow.

There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on
what you confabulate on any given occasion.

No, actually there are different answers if you are a representative of the
US government or the Ecuadorian one... without even going into what the
individual considers themselves to be.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, actually there are different answers depending on whether or not
you are a liar, and especially if you're a poor liar.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

your lies.

Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud.

Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination?

He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong?

But simply because you state that Mr. Cruz is with you doesn't necessarily
mean
he's actually there!

For a supposed DXer to think "Cruz" is the last name of an Hispanic is kind
of bizarre.