On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...



Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is
hardly an issue

Their only mistake was taking you at your word.

Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a convention
has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many
errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought.

Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol

The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos",
isn't it?

As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on
that occasion.

I suppose they also named you "President"?

And your point is? You don't like the name? Tough.

What name?




She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to
American
citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it.

But above you say she was never an American citizen. Better get your
story straight.

It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law.

You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen.

Under
Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American
nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of
majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an Ecuadorian
passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considereed ONLY an Ecuadorian
national. US law saw her as a dual national.

Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and
exercising it are not the same.

So far, no lie exists. I stated my elder daughter was born a dual
national
(she was Ecuadorian at birth is a true statement. She was American at
birth
was a true statement) and chose, later, which nation she would carry a
passport from. Seems simple to me.

"David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. "

Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she did
not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country
considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual
national. In other words, there are two answers to this question, depending
on whose laws you folow.

There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on
what you confabulate on any given occasion.


- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Steve wrote:

On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...



Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is
hardly an issue

Their only mistake was taking you at your word.

Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a convention
has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many
errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought.

Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol

The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos",
isn't it?

As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on
that occasion.

I suppose they also named you "President"?

And your point is? You don't like the name? Tough.

What name?




She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to
American
citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it.

But above you say she was never an American citizen. Better get your
story straight.

It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law.

You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen.

Under
Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American
nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of
majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an Ecuadorian
passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considereed ONLY an Ecuadorian
national. US law saw her as a dual national.

Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and
exercising it are not the same.

So far, no lie exists. I stated my elder daughter was born a dual
national
(she was Ecuadorian at birth is a true statement. She was American at
birth
was a true statement) and chose, later, which nation she would carry a
passport from. Seems simple to me.

"David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. "

Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she did
not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country
considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual
national. In other words, there are two answers to this question, depending
on whose laws you folow.

There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on
what you confabulate on any given occasion.

Yeah, and he is indeed a master confabulator.

I do give him credit for being a master pathological liar as well. He is certainly
on of the best I've come across.

But bit by bit, the mortar is coming apart in his fantasy world.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the
Internet, then provide a link to your Web site:

http://davidgleason.com/

The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to
extract the wrath of dxAss.

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...



Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is
hardly an issue

Their only mistake was taking you at your word.

Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a
convention
has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many
errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought.

Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol

Hardly. Since most of the attendees already knew who the presnters were at
my session, I doubt most even noticed.

The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos",
isn't it?

I have no idea what the reference you make is... we are talking about a
program (also available on the web) for the NAB convention several years ago
which had my title truncated... there was no article.

It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law.

You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen.

Under US law, she may be... you can see from the interesting infromation
from Mr. Gallagher that the issue is not balck and white. She was registered
as a US citizen at birth, she chose not to ever get either a US passport or
to pursue the citizenship otherwise. So, 40-some years later, she is
Ecuadorian.

Under
Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American
nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of
majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an
Ecuadorian
passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considered ONLY an Ecuadorian
national. US law saw her as a dual national.

Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and
exercising it are not the same.

Correct. As Mr Gallagher has pointed out, while another goverment may not
consider her a dual national, in many cases the US government does.

"David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. "

Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she
did
not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country
considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual
national. In other words, there are two answers to this question,
depending
on whose laws you folow.

There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on
what you confabulate on any given occasion.

No, actually there are different answers if you are a representative of the
US government or the Ecuadorian one... without even going into what the
individual considers themselves to be.

David Eduardo wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the
Internet, then provide a link to your Web site:

http://davidgleason.com/

The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to
extract the wrath of dxAss.

Dance little boy, dance!

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Feb 20, 7:01?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the
Internet, then provide a link to your Web site:

http://davidgleason.com/

The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to
extract the wrath of dxAss.



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. Now, the whole world
knows who you are, and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce !
This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are !

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the
Internet, then provide a link to your Web site:

http://davidgleason.com/

The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except
to
extract the wrath of dxAss.

Dance little boy, dance!


As I said, it extracts your wrath. Unfortunately, you are not always
particularly amusing... many of your responses are the same, over and over
and over.

When are you going on your Canadian vacation? Short on funds, eh?

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the
Internet, then provide a link to your Web site:

http://davidgleason.com/

The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except
to
extract the wrath of dxAss.

Dance little boy, dance!


As I said, it extracts your wrath. Unfortunately, you are not always
particularly amusing... many of your responses are the same, over and over
and over.

When are you going on your Canadian vacation? Short on funds, eh?

Edweenie, I'm no where near close to being short on funds. And I'm only about
175 miles away from CanaDuh.

Please, keep dancing.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

wrote in message
ps.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

Now, the whole world
knows who you are,

I have never hideen my name on Usenet... or even back to the BBS era on the
Well.

and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce !

There are already over 1000 HD FM's, and there are increasing numbers of
receivers. Nobody in the industry ever thought that the project would bear
short-term fruit (heck, the development started around 1991) so nobody in
the industry, today, thinks that HD is a farce. It is simply one tool in a
kit of many things radio has to do to remain viable.

AM, on the other hand, has bigger problems than whether HD will work... the
entire band, good stations and bad, is in rapid decline and the remaining
listeners are ageing.

This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are !


As I said, I dropped out to put my own radio station on the air in a large
market... a station that became #1 in its first few months on the air. I
must not have been too dumb, then.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Please, keep dancing.


Is that a macro, or do you think it is so original it needs repetition
several times a day?