Telamon wrote:

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


wrote in message
ps.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you
responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This
type of response sounds like total BS.

You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading
this thread.

You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like
it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you
post.

I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses
and decide to share on Usenet.

He's practised at the art of deception..

I don't hate David Eduardo.(it's all politicians all over the World that
I hate) But I don't like IBOC regardless of what anybody says.I really
doubt that anybody can ever convince me that IBOC is good.
cuhulin

wrote:

I don't hate David Eduardo.

I don't hate him either. I certainly do feel very sorry for him though. Mental
illness is a tough monkey.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers.

They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from
their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what
so-and-so's job title is.

Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a
panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got
the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast
companies.

So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you
also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political
ends. Pathetic.

That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by
an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers.

On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers.

They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from
their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what
so-and-so's job title is.

Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a
panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got
the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast
companies.

Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the
President of Programming?


So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you
also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political
ends. Pathetic.

That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by
an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers.

And of course there's no way that you could at some point have
actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group".
I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens.

Steve wrote:

On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers.

They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from
their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what
so-and-so's job title is.

Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a
panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got
the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast
companies.

Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the
President of Programming?


So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you
also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political
ends. Pathetic.

That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by
an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers.

And of course there's no way that you could at some point have
actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group".
I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens.

It happens in 'Edweenies World'..

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the
speakers.

They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from
their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what
so-and-so's job title is.

Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a
panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they
got
the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast
companies.

Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the
President of Programming?

Someone at NAB wrote it down wrong, probably.


So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you
also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political
ends. Pathetic.

That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled
by
an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers.

And of course there's no way that you could at some point have
actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group".
I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens.

Not in this case.

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


wrote in message
ps.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about
how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs
got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you
responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This
type of response sounds like total BS.

What BS is there in refuting the lies about AM rates, billing and ratings
with actual facts?

In addtion, the "reject" posted a list of supoposedly major 50 kw Am
stations as part of his argument on thier success and high rates... I spoke
with the managers of two of those stations who found it intersting that
there is a perception that AM is generally healthy wen it is not.

You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading
this thread.

So the truth about AM, with documented data (Arbitron, BIA, Miller Kaplan,
etc) is not credible. If I said that AM was healthy and growing, would you
have liked it better? Unfortunately, that is just not true.

You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like
it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you
post.

I am discounting "reject" because he has his facts totally wrong.

I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses
and decide to share on Usenet.

And that is what I posted... yet Mr. Reject keeps posting lies about AM that
he can neither document nor provide sources for his claims.... his limit is
to present a list of 50 kw stations, some of which are absolute dogs... as
if their existence proves that AM is "getting better every day."

On Feb 20, 11:14 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...





On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

groups.com...

On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the
speakers.

They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from
their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what
so-and-so's job title is.

Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a
panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they
got
the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast
companies.

Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the
President of Programming?

Someone at NAB wrote it down wrong, probably.

Sure. Just the way you told it to them.




So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you
also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political
ends. Pathetic.

That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled
by
an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers.

And of course there's no way that you could at some point have
actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group".
I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens.

Not in this case.

In any event, I hope you did not manage to discredit this other person
or damage their reputation in any way, which is obviously what you
intended.

dxAce wrote:

He's practised at the art of deception..


You owe the Stones some royalty money for that line.




mike