m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

He's practised at the art of deception..

You owe the Stones some royalty money for that line.

Perhaps, but I think they owe me more for my work on the board...

It all works out in the end.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Feb 21, 2:15?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...





In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about
how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs
got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you
responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This
type of response sounds like total BS.

What BS is there in refuting the lies about AM rates, billing and ratings
with actual facts?

In addtion, the "reject" posted a list of supoposedly major 50 kw Am
stations as part of his argument on thier success and high rates... I spoke
with the managers of two of those stations who found it intersting that
there is a perception that AM is generally healthy wen it is not.



You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading
this thread.

So the truth about AM, with documented data (Arbitron, BIA, Miller Kaplan,
etc) is not credible. If I said that AM was healthy and growing, would you
have liked it better? Unfortunately, that is just not true.



You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like
it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you
post.

I am discounting "reject" because he has his facts totally wrong.



I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses
and decide to share on Usenet.

And that is what I posted... yet Mr. Reject keeps posting lies about AM that
he can neither document nor provide sources for his claims.... his limit is
to present a list of 50 kw stations, some of which are absolute dogs... as
if their existence proves that AM is "getting better every day."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have some Britney Spears pubic hair that I can sell you.

wrote:

On Feb 21, 2:15?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...





In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about
how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs
got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you
responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This
type of response sounds like total BS.

What BS is there in refuting the lies about AM rates, billing and ratings
with actual facts?

In addtion, the "reject" posted a list of supoposedly major 50 kw Am
stations as part of his argument on thier success and high rates... I spoke
with the managers of two of those stations who found it intersting that
there is a perception that AM is generally healthy wen it is not.



You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading
this thread.

So the truth about AM, with documented data (Arbitron, BIA, Miller Kaplan,
etc) is not credible. If I said that AM was healthy and growing, would you
have liked it better? Unfortunately, that is just not true.



You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like
it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you
post.

I am discounting "reject" because he has his facts totally wrong.



I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses
and decide to share on Usenet.

And that is what I posted... yet Mr. Reject keeps posting lies about AM that
he can neither document nor provide sources for his claims.... his limit is
to present a list of 50 kw stations, some of which are absolute dogs... as
if their existence proves that AM is "getting better every day."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have some Britney Spears pubic hair that I can sell you.

I rather doubt that he's interested in a woman's pubic hair..

wrote in message
oups.com...

I have some Britney Spears pubic hair that I can sell you.


Yuuuuuuch.

David Eduardo wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

I have some Britney Spears pubic hair that I can sell you.


Yuuuuuuch.

Yep, I told ya!

wrote:

On Feb 21, 2:15?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...





In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about
how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs
got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you
responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This
type of response sounds like total BS.

What BS is there in refuting the lies about AM rates, billing and ratings
with actual facts?

In addtion, the "reject" posted a list of supoposedly major 50 kw Am
stations as part of his argument on thier success and high rates... I spoke
with the managers of two of those stations who found it intersting that
there is a perception that AM is generally healthy wen it is not.



You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading
this thread.

So the truth about AM, with documented data (Arbitron, BIA, Miller Kaplan,
etc) is not credible. If I said that AM was healthy and growing, would you
have liked it better? Unfortunately, that is just not true.



You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like
it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you
post.

I am discounting "reject" because he has his facts totally wrong.



I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses
and decide to share on Usenet.

And that is what I posted... yet Mr. Reject keeps posting lies about AM that
he can neither document nor provide sources for his claims.... his limit is
to present a list of 50 kw stations, some of which are absolute dogs... as
if their existence proves that AM is "getting better every day."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have some Britney Spears pubic hair that I can sell you.

Edweenie is a prancer.

y'all sure are whuppin up on DE.I reckon I better tell doggy,move over
doggy,and cut the light and get my beautimus sleep.Them divorced wimmin
next door will be wortking on putting up that dog pen in their back yard
in the morning and I always step over there and give them a hand and
help them drink their beer.I pay them back with a few of my Coor's light
beers though.They have my crowbar and my hammer and my post hole digger
and my tree limb loppers over there.

.......Larry

wrote:

On Feb 21, 2:15?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...





In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about
how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs
got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you
responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This
type of response sounds like total BS.

What BS is there in refuting the lies about AM rates, billing and ratings
with actual facts?

In addtion, the "reject" posted a list of supoposedly major 50 kw Am
stations as part of his argument on thier success and high rates... I spoke
with the managers of two of those stations who found it intersting that
there is a perception that AM is generally healthy wen it is not.



You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading
this thread.

So the truth about AM, with documented data (Arbitron, BIA, Miller Kaplan,
etc) is not credible. If I said that AM was healthy and growing, would you
have liked it better? Unfortunately, that is just not true.



You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like
it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you
post.

I am discounting "reject" because he has his facts totally wrong.



I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses
and decide to share on Usenet.

And that is what I posted... yet Mr. Reject keeps posting lies about AM that
he can neither document nor provide sources for his claims.... his limit is
to present a list of 50 kw stations, some of which are absolute dogs... as
if their existence proves that AM is "getting better every day."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have some Britney Spears pubic hair that I can sell you.

Edweenie is like a $3 bill.

David Eduardo wrote:

wrote in message
ps.com...

If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty
embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information,
then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies.

A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement.

In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and
operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the
one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how
little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio
stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got
more laughter than a good Leno monologue.

Now, the whole world
knows who you are,

I have never hideen my name on Usenet... or even back to the BBS era on the
Well.

and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce !

There are already over 1000 HD FM's, and there are increasing numbers of
receivers. Nobody in the industry ever thought that the project would bear
short-term fruit (heck, the development started around 1991) so nobody in
the industry, today, thinks that HD is a farce. It is simply one tool in a
kit of many things radio has to do to remain viable.

AM, on the other hand, has bigger problems than whether HD will work... the
entire band, good stations and bad, is in rapid decline and the remaining
listeners are ageing.

This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are !


As I said, I dropped out to put my own radio station on the air in a large
market... a station that became #1 in its first few months on the air. I
must not have been too dumb, then.

Dumb enough to get tossed out of the country at gunpoint.

And, there is still the question of whether you actually owned the station(s) in
the first place.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


As I said, I dropped out to put my own radio station on the air in a
large
market... a station that became #1 in its first few months on the air. I
must not have been too dumb, then.

Dumb enough to get tossed out of the country at gunpoint.

.... for voicing oppostition to a brutal dictatorship. That's something to be
proud of.

And, there is still the question of whether you actually owned the
station(s) in
the first place.

E mail to Carlos F. Cifuentes ] and ask him
who owned the station he workd for in the 60's. Fabricio is a TV personality
in Atlanta now, and was a Radio Musical DJ for many years in the 60's and
70's.