Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message k.net... "Dave Heil" wrote: Len Over 21 wrote: What is that to you? It effects me because I am an active radio amateur. You, on the other hand, are in no way involved. (snip) (snip) I think you must have me mixed up with you. I'm a radio amateur. You are a bystander. I'm somewhat uncomfortable with that, Dave. As I see it, when discussing a radio service which uses the radio frequencies that belong to all Americans, no American Citizen who wants to be involved is a bystander and all (Amateur and non-Amateur) have a right to be involved in the discussion. Likewise, I saw nothing in rules of this newsgroup which would restrict the participation of non-Amateurs. You may not like what Len has to say, but the lack of a Ham license alone should not diminish it or dismiss it. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Philosophically you are right Dwight. However, Len has a long history of diatribes and disjointed rambles that do not hang together. He is simply trying to agitate. I've kill filed his various aliases because of it. In contrast, the other denizens of this newsgroup, whether or not I agree with them, at least can put together a coherent statement of their point of view and the logic that they used to arrive at it. Naturally we all pick apart each other's logic when we don't agree or consider the logic faulty but the discussions make sense. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |