Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Feb 2007 11:45:01 -0800, "
wrote: +++On Feb 13, 10:20?am, james wrote: +++ On 12 Feb 2007 21:28:11 -0800, " +++ +++ wrote: +++ +++On Feb 12, 4:35?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: +++ +++ +++ The only "CW sub-bands" that Techs have is a small +++ +++ sliver on the bottom of two VHF ham bands. f course, +++ +++ all other classes can use those. shrug o? +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& +++ +++ Only giving back which was taken away. In a land far far away and +++ along time ago Techs had some CW priviledge on 2 and 6 meter CW if my +++ senile memory has not forgotten me. +++ +++ I'm sorry, but I fail to see your point. "CW" can be used just +++about +++ everywhere on amateur bands from 160m on up to sub-THz. +++ +++ My remark was on "CW" ONLY. Where's your beef? +++ +++ LA ************** No beef. Just stating that back in the 60's novices and techs had 2 meter CW priviledges that were altered at a later date. The FCC band usage has changed many times in the past 50 years. This recent change is not unusual or anything new. james |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No More Element 1 | Policy | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |