Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/2/2011 12:29 AM, Warhol wrote:
... since a few NASA employees post here maybe they have something to sat about this? Also the opposite of what NASA says is the truth... They will have egg on their faces again. No one wishes to stick their neck out and call it "ether" (or aether) for that matter ... even Einstein attempts to acknowledge "it" as the "cosmological effect" (basically, but denied by many, to be equiv. to a "cosmic ether.") I find many high schools and colleges are even "unaware" (or in some form of denial) to Einsteins admission of a "gravitational ether." Like I say, there is relatively "handful" of people who come right out and deal with ether as a substantial material, in academic and research branches. An example of what I am referring to is this abstract: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PhLA..152..458A Or, this one: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608164 Investigating with search terms composed of "gravitational ether", "cosmic ether", "cosmological effect", etc. will show the debate is far from over ... However, the "effect" which seems to go wanting for a proper name has already been covered under the name of "ether." However, since many have denied its' existence, but now are forced to admit "something is there", attempt to hide their mistaken denial in a "name change ploy/tactic." This has more to do with human nature and the refusal to admit mistakes than anything else ... Actually, quite funny to watch! Very smart people also suffer from such ego worship ... and the fear of being ostracized by their peers ... Simply put, you can still deny the "ether" if you just name "it" something else, since then, you deny the "it" is ether! ROFLOL Regards, JS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 2, 9:48*am, John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 12:29 AM, Warhol wrote: ... since a few NASA employees post here maybe they have something to sat about this? Also the opposite of what NASA says *is the truth... They will have egg on their faces again. No one wishes to stick their neck out and call it "ether" (or aether) for that matter ... even Einstein attempts to acknowledge "it" as the "cosmological effect" (basically, but denied by many, to be equiv. to a "cosmic ether.") I find many high schools and colleges are even "unaware" (or in some form of denial) to Einsteins admission of a "gravitational ether." Like I say, there is relatively "handful" of people who come right out and deal with ether as a substantial material, in academic and research branches. An example of what I am referring to is this abstract: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PhLA..152..458A Or, this one: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608164 Investigating with search terms composed of "gravitational ether", "cosmic ether", "cosmological effect", etc. will show the debate is far from over ... However, the "effect" which seems to go wanting for a proper name has already been covered under the name of "ether." *However, since many have denied its' existence, but now are forced to admit "something is there", attempt to hide their mistaken denial in a "name change ploy/tactic." *This has more to do with human nature and the refusal to admit mistakes than anything else ... Actually, quite funny to watch! *Very smart people also suffer from such ego worship ... and the fear of being ostracized by their peers ... Simply put, you can still deny the "ether" if you just name "it" something else, since then, you deny the "it" is ether! *ROFLOL Regards, JS I wont talk anymore about this, since ether is known to be air... just consult the ancient encyclopedia's. and in space there ain't no ether found... there is only the infinite void... Space does not bend. A ray/ a Beam does. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0109/3c175_vla.jpg And what is an atomic clock? what a joke... science filled with untrue claims. THE GREAT ATOMIC CLOCK SCAM! Like false religion, if they contradict each other each time. Maybe I should start a thread; "FAKE of CENTURY" BTW E = mc2 is not Einstein's equation at all... The big E just made "h" (plancks constant usable)... no such thing as dark energy/mass no anti gravity no black holes Space don't bend by gravity No Cosmic Ether if you have specifics perhaps ask Yids deliberately associated his name with it though for the usual reasons of deception and promoting the meme that the self chosen are superior intellects... the *******s who think they know, have no p.h.u.c.k.ing clue... PSS Ether, or luminiferous Ether, was the hypothetical substance through which electromagnetic waves travel. It was proposed by the greek philosopher Aristotle Eric Weisstein's World of Biography and used by several optical theories as a way to allow propagation of light, which was believed to be impossible in "empty" space. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Ether.html So it was and they changed the laws by fraud and made all students very dumb... the ancient knew what we don't know anymore. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
Hollywood libturds and their CLINICALLY INSANE leftist agenda.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=308456 Top Shrink says democraps and libturds are CLINICALLY INSANE! http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...nically+Insane cuhulin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/2/2011 7:22 AM, Warhol wrote:
... and in space there ain't no ether found... there is only the infinite void... Space does not bend. A ray/ a Beam does. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0109/3c175_vla.jpg ... Actually, the only way you can bend a light beam (or, any other electromagnetic beam or photons) is to bend the material which contains the beam. But, if you said something correct now, you would ruin your record of being 100% wrong -- good save! ROFLOL Regards, JS |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? So then he didn't acknowledge that the "gravitational ether" existed? He didn't acknowledge that space is bent like a mattress by a bowling ball, and subject to the forces of gravity? You are claiming lines of space (ether) penetrate through the earth as perfectly straight lines? Let's see the sources which cause you to reach that/those conclusion(s?) Regards, JS |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/2/11 11:34 , John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? So then he didn't acknowledge that the "gravitational ether" existed? He didn't acknowledge that space is bent like a mattress by a bowling ball, and subject to the forces of gravity? You are claiming lines of space (ether) penetrate through the earth as perfectly straight lines? Let's see the sources which cause you to reach that/those conclusion(s?) Regards, JS Wow. Two words and you misread it. I stand in awe. Einstein was quite clear that space was a non-Euclidian construct. That, in fact, it was quite flexible, and that there were no straight lines. And that it was finite. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
D. Peter Maus wrote:
Einstein was quite clear that space was a non-Euclidian construct. That, in fact, it was quite flexible, and that there were no straight lines. That would mean there are no straight lines anywhere...if you think about it. ;-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 2, 9:34*am, John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? So then he didn't acknowledge that the "gravitational ether" existed? He didn't acknowledge that space is bent like a mattress by a bowling ball, and subject to the forces of gravity? You are claiming lines of space (ether) penetrate through the earth as perfectly straight lines? Let's see the sources which cause you to reach that/those conclusion(s?) Regards, JS Obviously lensing proves the flexibility of space and perhaps even that of time which at least photons seem to respect, thereby establishing that it's by no means empty unless 1000 atomic particles plus whatever flow of gravity and magnetic fields per cubic meter is supposed to represent emptiness. If space were truly empty, photons could ether travel FTL and thereby become invisible to our best instruments, or perhaps not manage to go anywhere. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:34:10 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by John Smith : On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? Yes, really; Einstein showed that space bends, and therefore disagreed with the statement that "Space does not bend". snip -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE | Shortwave | |||
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was... | Shortwave | |||
Disturbing and mesmerizing whispering that the Oval Office... | Shortwave | |||
Recording of HAARP and Moon Echo | Shortwave | |||
European Craft Makes Safe, Soft Landing on Saturn Moon | Antenna |