Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
N2EY wrote:
In article k.net, "Dwight Stewart" writes: What does Jim's story have to do with license testing? Simple. It shows that the FCC has very wide authority to set license test criteria, including such concepts as "character" and "discipline". Merely passing the tests is not the only requirement for a license grant. Normally the FCC assumes that all applicants for a ham license are "of good character" unless there is a reason to suspect differently. I think FCC could indeed legally implement Hans' one-shot learner license with its upgrade-or-out provision. Their argument would be that someone who was a ham for 10 years and yet c/wouldn't pass the full-privs test simply didn't have the required "character" or "discipline" to stay in the ARS. Hoo, I wonder how that would stand up in the courts! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |