WELL IF I DIDN'T HAVE TO TALK TO A BUNCH OF ****ING ASSHOLES, I WONT
GIVE YOU AND YOUR LITTLE BITCH WHORE THE COURTESY OF BEING NICE. NO YOU
LITTLE ****ER YOU JUST CAN ****ING READ! I SAID I TYPE FAST THAT WHY IT
COMES OUT SCREWED UP, HAVE YOUR ****ING MOMMY READ THAT LINE TO YOU SO
YOU CAN ****ING UNDERSTAND.

Todd N9OGL

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

FIRST OFF YOU LITTLE ****S, AS FOR MY WRITING SKILLS, THE REASON
SOMETIMES IT COMES OUT LIKE CRAP, IS BECAUSE I'M TYPING THESE OUT
VERY
FAST. AS FOR BEING A "RETARD" OR HAVE A "LEARNING DISABLITY" IS NOT
TRUE, I JUST RECENTLY HAD A IQ TEST DONE BY THE ****ING STATE, AND
ACCORDING TO THEM I HAVE AN "EXTERMELY HIGH IQ". AS FOR MY
INFORMATION
BULLETIN YOU AND YOUR WHINEY LITTLE BITCHES ON THIS NEWSGROUP ARE A
SMALL MINORITY, AND AT LEASE I DON'T HIDE BEHIND A ****ING FAKE
NAME,
HELL BOY YOUR PROBABLY A HAM WANTABE, WHO SITS ON THIS NEWSGROUPS,
WITH
HIS LITTLE BOYFRIEND ON GET EACHOTHER NUTS OFF. SOMEONE WHO CAN'T
DEBATE THE REAL ISSUES AND HAS TO GO TO NAME CALLING, IS THE REAL
****ING RETARD!
THAT'S RIGHT, I APPLIED SEVEN TIMES FOR A BROADCAST LICENSE, AT
LEASE I
HAVE THE ****ING BALLS TO FIGHT FOR WHAT I BELIEVE IN, UNLIKE SOME
WHINEY HAM WANTABES WHO DO NOTHING BUT SIT ON THEIR FAT ASS AND GO
TO
NAME CALLING. FINALLY, I HAVE A OPINION, AND ALTHOUGH IT ISN'T LIKE
YOURS, I DO HAVE THE RIGHT, SO MY OPINION IS TAKE YOUR BOYFRIENDS
DICK
AND PUT IT BACK IN YOUR ****ING MOUTH, AND SHUT YOUR ****ING MOUTH
AND
KNOW YOUR ****ING ROLE YOU ****ING HAM WANTABE..


TODD N9OGL


For someone that supposedly has a high IQ (yea right, sure you do)
you
certainly haven't learned how to express yourself without those
little
jr. highschooler words, you can't spell and can't put together a
decent
sentence.

N9OGL wrote:

WELL IF I DIDN'T HAVE TO TALK TO A BUNCH OF snip, I WONT
GIVE YOU AND YOUR LITTLE snip THE COURTESY OF BEING NICE. NO YOU
LITTLE snip YOU JUST CAN snip READ! I SAID I TYPE FAST THAT WHY IT
COMES OUT SCREWED UP, HAVE YOUR snip MOMMY READ THAT LINE TO YOU SO
YOU CAN snip UNDERSTAND.

Todd, you've gone from being thick-headed to being annoying. If typing
fast is your problem, why not slow it down so that your posts are
coherent? I can't make sense of much of your stuff. My mommy wouldn't
be able to make sense of it. It is disjointed, poorly punctuated,
misspelled crap. Writing it in all caps won't help it make sense.
Repeatedly claiming a high IQ won't help it. Want to show us how bright
you are? Leave out the swearing and see if you can make yourself
understood.

As to talking to us, you don't have to do that at all. It should be
apparent to you that nobody here supports your broadcasts/information
bulletins. Your several recent posts aren't doing anything to win you
support.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

WELL IF I DIDN'T HAVE TO TALK TO A BUNCH OF snip, I WONT
GIVE YOU AND YOUR LITTLE snip THE COURTESY OF BEING NICE. NO YOU
LITTLE snip YOU JUST CAN snip READ! I SAID I TYPE FAST THAT WHY
IT
COMES OUT SCREWED UP, HAVE YOUR snip MOMMY READ THAT LINE TO YOU
SO
YOU CAN snip UNDERSTAND.

Todd, you've gone from being thick-headed to being annoying. If
typing
fast is your problem, why not slow it down so that your posts are
coherent? I can't make sense of much of your stuff. My mommy
wouldn't
be able to make sense of it. It is disjointed, poorly punctuated,
misspelled crap. Writing it in all caps won't help it make sense.
Repeatedly claiming a high IQ won't help it. Want to show us how
bright
you are? Leave out the swearing and see if you can make yourself
understood.

As to talking to us, you don't have to do that at all. It should be
apparent to you that nobody here supports your broadcasts/information
bulletins. Your several recent posts aren't doing anything to win
you
support.

The reasons that no one supports my inforamtion bulletins is the small
minority of amateur radio operators thinks that information bulletins
are illegal.
Todd N9OGL
Dave K8MN

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...



[snip]

The reasons that no one supports my inforamtion bulletins is the small
minority of amateur radio operators thinks that information bulletins
are illegal.
Todd N9OGL

Absolutely no one has ever said information bulletins are illegal. So long
as they meet the requirements of Part 97 there is no problem. However from
your description of the content, they appear to be op ed pieces rather than
information.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...

The reasons that no one supports my inforamtion bulletins is the
small
minority of amateur radio operators thinks that information
bulletins
are illegal.

Absolutely no one has ever said information bulletins are illegal.
So long
as they meet the requirements of Part 97 there is no problem.
However from
your description of the content, they appear to be op ed pieces
rather than
information.

Maybe "Todd" can sell time on his "broadcast" so Lennie can get
some mike time.

Other than Part 95 or Part 15, it will be the only way his voice
ever hits the airwaves.

Steve, K4YZ

Dee Flint wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...



[snip]

The reasons that no one supports my inforamtion bulletins is the
small
minority of amateur radio operators thinks that information
bulletins
are illegal.
Todd N9OGL

Absolutely no one has ever said information bulletins are illegal.
So long
as they meet the requirements of Part 97 there is no problem.
However from
your description of the content, they appear to be op ed pieces
rather than
information.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Show me what regulations and/or rules that state an information
bulletin can't be opinionated. Many Amateurs on this newsgroup believe
that information bulletins can't be opinionated. There is no rules that
states that an information bulletin can't be opinionated, because if it
did it would be a violation of Section 326. My opinions on my bulletin
address many amateur radio issues, and only amateur radio issues.
Regardless of what many people on this newsgroup think I have the law
on my side. but feel free to prove me wrong.

TODD N9OGL

Dee, I'll go a little farther, No where in the rules does it state that
an information bulletin can be opinionated. The only thing the rules
state is that an information bulletin must be "amateur radio related".
Thus, anything outside that scope would be consider broadcasting. For
example, if someone one was to run an information bulletin about what
he thinks is a good antenna for DX and how to set up; it would fall
under the scope. But if Someone was to run an information bulletin
about what they think about the presidents economic plan, then it would
fall outside the scope of an inforamtion bulletin and fall into the
range of broadcasting. I not a gambler but I would bet the federal
courts would see it that way too.

Todd N9OGL


Dee Flint wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...



[snip]

The reasons that no one supports my inforamtion bulletins is the
small
minority of amateur radio operators thinks that information
bulletins
are illegal.
Todd N9OGL

Absolutely no one has ever said information bulletins are illegal.
So long
as they meet the requirements of Part 97 there is no problem.
However from
your description of the content, they appear to be op ed pieces
rather than
information.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
Dee, I'll go a little farther, No where in the rules does it state that
an information bulletin can be opinionated. The only thing the rules
state is that an information bulletin must be "amateur radio related".
Thus, anything outside that scope would be consider broadcasting. For
example, if someone one was to run an information bulletin about what
he thinks is a good antenna for DX and how to set up; it would fall
under the scope. But if Someone was to run an information bulletin
about what they think about the presidents economic plan, then it would
fall outside the scope of an inforamtion bulletin and fall into the
range of broadcasting. I not a gambler but I would bet the federal
courts would see it that way too.

Todd N9OGL



Everyone would agree that information on what is a good antenna for DX or or
government rulings on antennas would be within the scope of Part 97. And
everyone would agree that a piece on the president's economic plan is
outside the scope. No one has ever said otherwise.

However an editorial on what you think hams should be doing quite possibly
may not classify as information. There's little in an editorial piece that
is of use to hams. Although editorials are derived from facts, they
themselves are not intended to convey information.

The other item that makes things look bad is that from your posts, it
appears as if you are using the ham bands because you were turned down for a
broadcast license. Even if you restrict your content to Part 97 to keep it
legal, it looks as if your interest is broadcasting rather than ham radio.
So why bother? It's too limiting for your objective of being a broadcaster.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

I would disagree with you on that, Information is 50% facts and 50%
opinions; You can get information from facts as well as from opinions.
like I said until I see a ruling or a rule that states information
bulletins can not be opinonated in my humble opinion they are legal.
Why bother what?? I did understand that last part.
Todd n9ogl

FROM THE FCC WEBSITE:

http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ama...ations.html#s3

One-Way Transmissions


Q. What types of one-way communications are amateur stations authorized
to transmit?

A. Section 97.111(b) provides for one-way communications. In summary,
auxiliary, beacon, space and stations in distress are specifically
authorized to make certain one-way transmissions. Additionally, an
amateur station may transmit the following types of one-way
communications:


Brief transmissions necessary to make adjustments to the station;


Brief transmissions necessary for establishing two-way communications
with other stations;


Telecommand;


Transmissions necessary to providing emergency communications;


Transmissions necessary to assisting persons learning, or improving
proficiency in, the international Morse code;


Transmissions necessary to disseminate an information bulletin; and


Telemetry.

Q. What is an "information bulletin"?

A. The term is defined in Section 97.3. It is a message directed only
to amateur operators and consists solely of subject matter of direct
interest to the amateur service. The control operator of the station
transmitting an information bulletin is responsible for determining
that the subject matter is of direct interest to the amateur service.

Q. Does an amateur station transmitting information bulletins have to
share the channel?

A. Yes. Section 97.101 provides that each station licensee and each
control operator must cooperate in selecting transmitting channels and
in making the most effective use of the amateur service frequencies. A
specific transmitting channel is not assigned for the exclusive use of
any amateur station. Section 97.101 also provides that no amateur
operator shall cause interference to any radio communication or signal.
There is no exemption for amateur stations transmitting for information
bulletins.

Q. Is broadcasting prohibited?

A. Yes. Section 97.113 prohibits amateur stations from engaging in any
form of broadcasting or in any activity related to program production
or news gathering for broadcasting purposes.

Q. Is there an exception to this prohibition?

A. Yes, there is one exception: Communications directly related to the
immediate safety of human life or the protection of property may be
provided by amateur stations to broadcasters for dissemination to the
public where no other means of communication is reasonably available
before or at the time of the event.

Q. What is "broadcasting"?

A. Section 97.3 defines the term "broadcasting," in the context of the
amateur service, as a transmission intended for reception by the
general public, either direct or delayed.