Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 18th 05, 12:38 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments


K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.


Dave is trying to insult me.


I'll have to admit, Brain...

Dave could NEVER insult you half as well as you insult yourself...


But you're a proven liar, so what am I to believe?

If I'd wanted to post an
instructional message on DXing, I'd likely post it to the DX newsgroup.


Do you need directions?


Do you know of one? It certainly doesn't seem so from what we've
seen posted here from you in the past, Brain.


I do just fine.

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".


Perhaps you have no passion for the subject matter.


So...

If Lennie doesn't insult and demean the other commentor, he's not
"passion(ate)" about what he's commenting on?


Perhaps you should ask Len?

He had to write seven attack "replies" to the FCC on this docket
alone?


Hmmmm? Seven attacks? Rings a bell.

Your organ grinder pal


Organ grinder pal?

Are you trying to insult someone? In your comments on RRAP, why do you
find it necessary to target single individuals and groups?


If it's not a single person or a group, what is it?

And Brain...

You ARE Lennie's red-hatted monkey.


And you're a proven liar, so what am I to believe?

hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years. He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.


I guess Len is relegated to a life of professional radio.


No...he COULD have had a life in "professional radio".

Very little of any of Lennie's CV deals with "radio".


"A" NCOIC of Okinawa MARS. State Militia comms officer. CAP comms
officer. Hi!

Carry on, little red-hatted monkey.


More insults? Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good
DX!


Lame redirect, Brain. Ineffective, transparent.

Steve, K4YZ


"Your Honor, I STRENUOUSLY Object!"

  #2   Report Post  
Old November 16th 05, 11:37 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.
It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.


Dave is trying to insult me.


Yep, I'm responding in kind to your usual red-hatted monkey routine.

If I'd wanted to post an
instructional message on DXing, I'd likely post it to the DX newsgroup.


Do you need directions?


"Redicule"?

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".


Perhaps you have no passion for the subject matter.


Perhaps Windy just got his feathers ruffled in comments on an endeavor
in which he is not a participant.

Your organ grinder pal


Organ grinder pal?


Yep, as Hans Brakob has pointed out on a number of occasions, Len is the
organ grinder; you are the red-hatted monkey.

Are you trying to insult someone?


Are you insulted that I've pointed out the obvious?

In your comments on RRAP, why do you
find it necessary to target single individuals and groups?


I don't just target single individuals, Brian. Married folks are fair game.

...hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years. He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.


I guess Len is relegated to a life of professional radio.


Len is relegated to his retirement from professional radio and to no
connection with amateur radio.

Carry on, little red-hatted monkey.


More insults? Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good
DX!


Examine your comments to my post and get back to me.

Dave K8MN

  #3   Report Post  
Old November 18th 05, 12:47 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments


Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.
It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.
"Rediculing"? You've spent so much time conversing with Mark that
you're starting to write like him.


Dave is trying to insult me.


Yep, I'm responding in kind to your usual red-hatted monkey routine.


No. You're responding in your usual smug way.

If I'd wanted to post an
instructional message on DXing, I'd likely post it to the DX newsgroup.


Do you need directions?


"Redicule"?


D-I-R-E-C-T-I-O-N-S. Do you need some?

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".


Perhaps you have no passion for the subject matter.


Perhaps Windy just got his feathers ruffled in comments on an endeavor
in which he is not a participant.


He is participating in the comments and the replies. At the
Government's invitation.

Your organ grinder pal


Organ grinder pal?


Yep, as Hans Brakob has pointed out on a number of occasions, Len is the
organ grinder; you are the red-hatted monkey.


Hans the Dump Huck caller?

Are you trying to insult someone?


Are you insulted that I've pointed out the obvious?


Do you still require D-I-R-E-C-T-I-O-N-S?

In your comments on RRAP, why do you
find it necessary to target single individuals and groups?


I don't just target single individuals, Brian. Married folks are fair game.


I notice that you're taken with Mark's wife.

...hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years. He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.


I guess Len is relegated to a life of professional radio.


Len is relegated to his retirement from professional radio and to no
connection with amateur radio.


You never know when one will come out of retirement.

Carry on, little red-hatted monkey.


More insults? Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good
DX!


Examine your comments to my post and get back to me.

Dave K8MN


Not interested in your smug attitude and insulting behavio[u]r. But
thanks.

  #4   Report Post  
Old November 17th 05, 01:43 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments

From: on Nov 15, 7:14 pm

Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.


It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good DX!


Pillar? Pillar of salt...Lots :-)

Poor Davie...if he had looked back over 3,783 filings on WT
Docket 05-235 he would have seen MORE! Woulda liquified
his "salt". MELT-DOWN! :-)

Well, Davie ought to go back into the ECFS and look under
WT Docket 98-143 on 25 January 1999. He can see Dudly the
Imposter's name there. Ten days AFTER the official
(extended twice) END of filings on 98-143 ol' Dud tried to
get the FCC to turn a deaf ear to me. Davie has about 8
days to do the same, repeating history of the elite meeting
to beat...down those against the code test. :-)



  #5   Report Post  
Old November 19th 05, 02:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments

wrote:
From: on Nov 15, 7:14 pm

Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.


It should come as no suprise that Dave/K8MN has just posted his longest
post ever not providing the details or tips for aspiring DXers, but in
rediculing someone who has had an -almost- lifelong interest in radio.

Way to go, Dave. Pillar of the radio community. Good DX!


Pillar? Pillar of salt...Lots :-)


Grab yer piller and have a nice nap, old timer.

Poor Davie...if he had looked back over 3,783 filings on WT
Docket 05-235 he would have seen MORE! Woulda liquified
his "salt". MELT-DOWN! :-)


If I didn't MELT-DOWN after reading your eight listed documents, I don't
think there's any chance that I ever would. I think you may be the
champion of verbosity for all documents submitted, Windy. Tsk, tsk.
Pip pip and a "poor baby" or two.

Well, Davie ought to go back into the ECFS and look under
WT Docket 98-143 on 25 January 1999. He can see Dudly the
Imposter's name there. Ten days AFTER the official
(extended twice) END of filings on 98-143 ol' Dud tried to
get the FCC to turn a deaf ear to me. Davie has about 8
days to do the same, repeating history of the elite meeting
to beat...down those against the code test. :-)


I see. Steve made a comment about you and that excuses all of your
attacks for all time.

You exhibit a lack of class, Len.

Dave K8MN


  #6   Report Post  
Old November 21st 05, 12:31 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments

You exhibit a lack of class, Len.

Incorrect. I have several FIRST CLASS Radiotelephone (Commercial)
license certificates. Want to see them? :-)

Buy,



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Power Industry BPL Reply Comments & Press Release Jeff Maass Antenna 38 June 29th 04 11:19 PM
Power Industry BPL Reply Comments & Press Release Jeff Maass Antenna 0 June 25th 04 11:25 PM
BPL pollution - file reply comments by August 6 Dave Shrader Antenna 4 July 30th 03 05:25 AM
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 Peter Lemken Antenna 0 July 27th 03 09:47 AM
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED Allodoxaphobia Antenna 2 July 10th 03 11:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017