If it was your intention to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster
(CBer),
and deliberately setting out to cause offence is most certainly
childish, then continue with your Childish Broadcasting (CB) such
as you use below.

Grow up, Galen Watts!

Stupid child.

W8LNA wrote:
I got news for ya chappie, the war's over, you can get those parts for
your head now.
Yeah, yeah, I know, 'stupid boy.'
You need some new material, and maybe some vitamin C tabs, ya been
suckin' limes* so long you're sour completely through.
*- Apologies to all the British possibly offended by this remark with
the exception of G4SDW, who it was intended to offend.

Pierian Spring wrote:
If it was your intention to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster
(CBer),
and deliberately setting out to cause offence is most certainly
childish, then continue with your Childish Broadcasting (CB) such
as you use below.

Grow up, Galen Watts!

Bullseye!

Gee, he can use a call sign lookup page, I'm really, really scared!

Maybe I should file a report with the Melksham police.

I'd bet they know who you are, Springy Ol' boy.

What's more childish, a casual insult across the internet or actually
going far enough to get arrested for intimidation across the internet?

I suspect the latter.


W8LNA
Galen Watts
HC 63 Box 309
Arbovale, WV 24915-9741

If anyone is arrested as the result of a malicious
and perjurous complaint, then that arrest, and any corresponding
bringing of Ham Radio into disrepute, is a reflection on the
criminal making the complaint, in this case, Brian Reay, G8OSN/M3OSN,
and not on his unfortunate victim.

Brian Reay subjected me to a vicious, malicious and distressing
campaign of harassment over a number of years when he
repeatedly accused me of sheep-shagging, said that my
wife was a sheep in the bed next to me, and accused
me of drinking methylated spirit. I did not respond to him
other than to chastise him for his grossly offensive behaviour.

When it became apparent that Brian Reay was a schoolteacher,
and had been conducting his sexually deviant campaign when
he was under training at a girls's school in Dartford, Kent,
I responded by suggesting that such a campaign meant that
he was a danger to children. Brian Reay's infantile psyche
could not deal with having the tables turned on him, and
he made a perjurous and malicious complaint to the plods
suggesting that it was I who was harassing him, rather than
the other way about. Brian Reay is a w*nkmason and it seems that
his fellow w*nkmasons in the plods will not take action against him
for wasting plod time in the way that he did.

If it was your intention to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster
(CBer), and deliberately setting out to cause offence is most
certainly childish, then continue with your Childish Broadcasting
(CB) such as you use below.

Grow up, Galen Watts!

Stupid child.

W8LNA wrote:
Bullseye!
Gee, he can use a call sign lookup page, I'm really, really scared!
Maybe I should file a report with the Melksham police.
I'd bet they know who you are, Springy Ol' boy.
What's more childish, a casual insult across the internet or actually
going far enough to get arrested for intimidation across the internet?
I suspect the latter.

"Pierian Spring" wrote in message
ups.com...
If anyone is arrested as the result of a malicious
and perjurous complaint,
Pray tell, has there been a prosecution, or conviction against Mr Reay for
the above "alleged" malicious and perjurous complaints, if not your
allegations must be groundless.

Brian Reay is a we*nkmason
Right all is now clear...I take it you have never been invited to join, yet
another goal you have failed to achieve.

Pierian Spring wrote:

Brian Reay subjected me to a vicious, malicious and distressing
campaign of harassment...

Considering your behavior here I sincerely doubt your account of Mr.
Reay's actions, especially when you refer to the constabulary as 'the
plods,' a strong indication of your own denial of reality. I suspect
(there's a word you're used to, eh?) the police reviewed transcripts of
your exchanges with Mr. Reay and apparently determined you were the
threat, as you were the party taken in to custody.

Ta ta,
W8LNA, 'Stupid Child'

The plods did not check out any transcripts of mine, and took
Brian Reay at his word. I rapidly produced in defence a pile
6 inches thick of Brian Reay's infantile and grossly offensive
remarks to me and the plods had to back down. I had no
"exchanges" with Reay - I merely responded in defence
against him to chasitise him for his gratuitous offensive
onslaughts - not dissimilar from your own.

The trial of the plod Richard Fuller for assault is scheduled
to take place on the 8th February at Chippenham Magistrates'
Court.

My behaviour here has always been in support of the
technical pursuit that is _REAL Ham Radio and trying
to maintain standards of decency in response to the
outbursts of rather silly and infantile people such as
yourself.

Indeed, in respect of your rather silly and infantile behaviour,
if you wish to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster (CBer)
then just carry on with the Childish Broadcasting (CB) that
you utter below.

W8LNA wrote:
Pierian Spring wrote:
Brian Reay subjected me to a vicious, malicious and distressing
campaign of harassment...
Considering your behavior here I sincerely doubt your account of Mr.
Reay's actions, especially when you refer to the constabulary as 'the
plods,' a strong indication of your own denial of reality. I suspect
(there's a word you're used to, eh?) the police reviewed transcripts of
your exchanges with Mr. Reay and apparently determined you were the
threat, as you were the party taken in to custody.

Ta ta,
W8LNA, 'Stupid Child'

Pierian Spring wrote:
....
if you wish to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster...

Frankly I don't care how you perceive me.

You, on the other hand, seem to be perceived by the others on this group
as just that you decry, childish.

My behaviour here has always been in support of the
technical pursuit that is _REAL Ham Radio and trying
to maintain standards of decency...

Whose standards? Yours? Do those 'standards' involve assisting
newcomers, or do you just call them 'childish' and gloat from your
soiled, ivory tower?

Oh for pity's sake.

It seems everyone here knows who you are, where you live etc. So why
can't you post under your own name and call sign, instead of some
fantastically pompous delusion that you're representative of some font
of wisdom?

A font of pomposity, yes. Wisdom and knowledge? I'd laugh if you
weren't so incredibly pitiful.

Go build something, follow your own FAQ,
W8LNA

If you wish forever henceforth to be perceived as a Childish
Broadcaster (CBer) then just continue with your aggressive
assaults in the manner of Childish Broadcasting (CB) that
you emit below.

Grow up, Galen!

Stupid child.

W8LNA wrote:
Frankly I don't care how you perceive me.
You, on the other hand, seem to be perceived by the others on this group
as just that you decry, childish.
Whose standards? Yours? Do those 'standards' involve assisting
newcomers, or do you just call them 'childish' and gloat from your
soiled, ivory tower?
Oh for pity's sake.
It seems everyone here knows who you are, where you live etc. So why
can't you post under your own name and call sign, instead of some
fantastically pompous delusion that you're representative of some font
of wisdom?
A font of pomposity, yes. Wisdom and knowledge? I'd laugh if you
weren't so incredibly pitiful.
Go build something, follow your own FAQ,
W8LNA

There's no denial of reality in following the example
set by the Oddity Of Ploddity that is the We'll ****e
(All Over You) Constabulary....

At 16:45 on the 3rd July 2000, Bobby Young, an Acting
Inspector screamed at me, "ANY OLD PLOD WILL NOT DO!".
(Perhaps it is no wonder the childish disposition of the
common plod when their leaders behave so badly)

In the evening of 7th March this year, David Hunt W1361
referred to the "common plod".

So.....it seems to me that if it is acceptable for the plods
to use the word, "plod" when discussing the plods with
members of the public, then it is acceptable for members
of the public to use the word, "plod" when discussing the plods,
either with the plods, or with people who are not plods.

W8LNA wrote:
... especially when you refer to the constabulary as 'the
plods,' a strong indication of your own denial of reality.

Pierian Spring of verbal diarrhoea wrote:
At 16:45 on the 3rd July 2000, Bobby Young, an Acting
Inspector screamed at me, "ANY OLD PLOD WILL NOT DO!".
(Perhaps it is no wonder the childish disposition of the
common plod when their leaders behave so badly)

OK Beanie, don't keep us in suspense, what caused him to scream that at
you, and why did you note the exact date and time?
....(_!_)...