Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
A. Melon wrote:

In article . com
"an Old friend" wrote:
cut
Guess he was bored with the one he married.

and interesting that he attacks me so vicously for being a BIsexual
male but will flirt with Bisexual female

It is even more interesting that you've been carrying on this exchange
with the anonymous remailer user who has been calling you a faggot for
the past couple of weeks.

weeks?

don't think so but you can't tell with the remailers

and unlike you I can polite to anyone, even those that dispise me, if
they can be polite in turn


I've not only not flirted with bisexual woman, I've not flirted with any
woman in any newsgroup. You can lead a dyslexic to Google, but you
can't make him read.

meaning no one my be premitted to form his/her own opinion on anything
without Daves aproval. I bet your wife would disagree with your
assement if she read all of your various exachnges with that woman

Indeed I also simply can't understand how you can maneg to polite to a
bisexaul female and yet be so moraly repulsed by a bisexual male

and more of you bashing the disabled

Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

cut

More word play.

Word play? Hardly. I've never participated in a State Department net
on RTTY or CW.

More word play. Clintonesque.

I fail to see any word play. I made a factual and concise statement of
the truth.


the very meaning of word play as word play. Nicely done

Further down you just admitted to opening and closing RTTY net using CW
on "another frequency."

Yes, I did. I was not active on any CW or RTTY net. It can't be much
more plain that that.


so you closed a RTTY net that were not on with CW?

Thank you for pointing out my error. I closed a RTTY circuit by use of
CW on another frequency. There was no net involved.

the only plain meaning in there would saying you are nuts
cut

That would be the only meaning with which you could come up. Well...

It never began.


You should work on your facts.

The W1AW operator is paid a salary to transmit on amateur frequencies.
School teachers may make radio transmissions as a part of their paid
instructions to students.

Is the W1AW op paid to transmit? Are you certain? School teachers
receive a salary for teaching, not for demonstrating amateur radio.


more word play

If you mean that I used words to respond, then you are correct.

cut


As in "deep-sixed".


As in "murdered?"

If "murdered" is what you want to write, then write it. You aren't
going to twist my words.


no one is trying to twist your words just trying to pin you down to
what you mean

I wrote what I meant in the first place. Brian is trying to get me to
say another thing.

Indeed I think most people have an easier time reading my stuff at its
worst than reading your dreck

I think you may have just written your biggest fabrication of all.

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

A. Melon wrote:


In article . com
"an Old friend" wrote:

cut

Guess he was bored with the one he married.

and interesting that he attacks me so vicously for being a BIsexual
male but will flirt with Bisexual female

It is even more interesting that you've been carrying on this exchange
with the anonymous remailer user who has been calling you a faggot for
the past couple of weeks.


weeks?

don't think so but you can't tell with the remailers

and unlike you I can polite to anyone, even those that dispise me, if
they can be polite in turn

Polite in return? Seek comfort wherever you can find it, Mark. Check
Google for Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ or KC8JBO to see who you've cozied up to.

I've not only not flirted with bisexual woman, I've not flirted with any
woman in any newsgroup. You can lead a dyslexic to Google, but you
can't make him read.


meaning no one my be premitted to form his/her own opinion on anything
without Daves aproval.

That isn't what it means at all, Mark. It means that you can go to an
archived source and still not be able to comprehend what you are looking at.

I bet your wife would disagree with your
assement if she read all of your various exachnges with that woman

You'd be completely and utterly wrong...again.

Indeed I also simply can't understand how you can maneg to polite to a
bisexaul female and yet be so moraly repulsed by a bisexual male

You've misread or misunderstood or are deliberately being obtuse. The
woman is not, repeat no bisexual. She is not, repeat not a stripper. At
no time did I flirt with her.

Would you like to see my archived comments from the alt.west-virginia
newsgroup on those who claim to be bisexual? Right he

--------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Dave Heil Mar 12 2003, 6:15 am
Newsgroups: alt.west-virginia
From: Dave Heil - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 06:15:48 GMT
Local: Wed, Mar 12 2003 6:15 am
Subject: looking in wv

wrote:

hello i am a married 26 yr old bisexual female i am looking for a female
in the same area to get to know and hopefully get together with...if you
are interesed please email me i would love to hear from you ...females
or couples only...no single men remember i am married..thanks

Buns,

Let's see if we have this straight. You can cheat on your husband with
another woman or you and your husband can cheat with another couple but
you can't cheat on your husband with a single man. Does that about sum
it up?

I'm sure you folks are quite normal--in your own way.

Dave in Cameron
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

To another couple of sexual adventurers who appeared in the same
newsgroup, I wrote:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


2. Dave Heil Jan 6 2004, 8:16 am
Newsgroups: alt.west-virginia
From: Dave Heil - Find messages by this author
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:16:23 GMT
Local: Tues, Jan 6 2004 8:16 am
Subject: 301 MD couple seeking 3some or 4some....

Sus wrote:

Married white couple seeking male or female 3some or 4some. She is 37,
he is 46, both are in excellent physical condition.

Your psychological and moral condition seemingly leaves a little to be
desired. One can only hope that you don't have children.

Dave near Cameron

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

and more of you bashing the disabled

My comments were directed not to the disabled as a group, but to you.
You are a vicious, lying SOB. My apologies to the truly disabled.

Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


wrote:

cut


Fantastic! An endorsement from the World's Greatest DXer. I'll
request that it be known as the "Heil Award," in your honor.

I've seen nothing to indicate an endorsement from the World's Greatest
DXer. Perhaps you received an e-mail from him. While I haven't
endorsed the idea, I have encouraged you to pursue it.


indeed you do always encourage people to feed your ego

You keep showing us that you can't comprehend the written word. I asked
for no credit. The idea is Brian Burke's. I've never claimed to be the
World's Greatest DXer. You've come up with nothing once again, frantic
fabricator.

cut


As to learning "ANY diplomacy",


there is never an instance where an ambassador calls a communications
type and says, "We've just received news from Washington. I want you to
go to the Foreign Ministry and make a demarche".


And there you have it.

Yes, there you have it. Ambassadors, Deputy Chiefs of Mission,
Political and Economics Officers make demarches, telephone and write to
foreign ministers, presidents, prime ministers and the like.
Information Management personnel have quite different job requirements.


indeed We may all the god for that...

We may all the god? Just how do we accomplish that?

...the fact you were a file clerk was
obviously much better for the nation and the world than puting you in
real diplomatic work

Ah, ah, ah, manic manufacturer of fables! I was never a file clerk.
There are people who file things in embassies. They used to be called
"secretaries" but they're now called "Office Management Specialists".
Then again, those of us who were "Information Management Specialists" as
a broad subgroup, used to be "Support Communications Officers". I liked
the old term. The generic term "Communicators" is used on a daily basis.


He was merely their messenger.

Perhaps it soothes you to cling to that belief.


In addition to sending messages, what else did you do?

I'm certain that I've outlined it before. In addition to sending
messages, I received messages. :-)


My My such ornerous duties

Only a twit would cut an entire paragraph and then write "My My such
ornerous duties (sic)".

cut
me up.

Cut you up? Is this the masochistic side of you coming to the surface?

Then there's Heil's thrilling tales of African adventures
where he "synchronized" State Department communications via
morsemanship in the 1980s...

He opened and closed rtty circuits with CW?

He surely did, but not on the same frequency as the RTTY circuit.


What frequency?

A different one!


i see more non answer answerer

An answer was provided. You didn't like it. You have no clearance and
no need to know.

cut


None of that has anything to do with amateur radio...unless one
counts the entirety of the Department of State as an "amateur"
effort of foreign policy.

Do you think has an anti-U.S. Foreign Policy bias, Brian?


I -could- pretend to not understand your question, but that would be
too heilish.

I think that Len has an anti-Heil bias.

That has been obvious, but I asked about a U.S. Foreign Policy bias. He
has frequently taken pot shots at the U.S. Department of State and U.S.
Foreign Policy.


Indeed and you flame Len for this american tradition of questioning the
action of the natiion, you flame him for prefroming the DUTY of an
amercian citizen

I'm sure that Len does a lot of "preforming". In this instance, he was
not questioning any action at all, just thumping on the Department of
State. I don't expect you to be able to tell the difference. Ask for
some help.

cut


With that degree, you'd likely be able to figure that Bissau and
Freetown are across the continent from Asmara. When my old colleagues
speak of the "West African Echo" they don't include East Africa. Go
figure. I didn't work into nor did I work through Asmara. The missing
piece of the puzzle for both of you is the location of the station I
worked into. Good luck.


Ascension.

I only wish I was at liberty to tell you.


rich the I could tell you bit have to kill routine. Tom cruise does it
better dave
cut

I was doing it before Tom Cruise was old enough to work. The fact is,
there are things which I know that I simply can't share with you. If it
bothers you, I don't care.

I agree. Has Len been insulted? denigrated? belittled?

If there's a God in Heaven, he has.


mighty generous

I'm a mighty generous guy.

As to the FCC staffer schpiel, it has been previously addressed a number
of times. Len isn't an FCC staffer, nor is he a radio amateur.


Nor are most FCC staffers, even the ones dealing directly with amateur
radio.

That's right. They're paid to do a job, whether they participate in
some radio service or not. Len isn't a participant and he isn't a
regulator.


so what?

Check Google. I don't have time to explain it for those who can't keep up.

why do you seem to deny the rights of american citizen in amercia?

Len has no right for his views to be accepted. His views carry no more
weight than my own. The terms "America" and "American" are capitalized.
There is no "Amercia".

Heil may have spent too much time in the basement with his radios.

Now *that* would be weird. My hamshack consists of two, adjacent second
floor rooms.


You told us you lived in a tarpaper shack.

There's tarpaper under there somewhere.


ah yess another lie

Let me see if I understand you. You wan't to promote a quarrel over
whether there is tarpaper on my house? Do I have it correct?

Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


cut

That's three things offered by you as fact. Please provide any old
evidence at all that what you've claimed, that Jim Miccolis prevented
Len from presenting his views here. A single instance will do.

Do you ever tire of being wrong?

Do you ever tire of being an A1 Operator and work out of band Frenchmen
on 6 meters?

Do you?

Why no, Brian, I've never tired of being an A-1 Op. Do you tire of
being one?


I have no certificate from Hiram, suitable for framing. But I do take
pride in my station, my signal, and my operating abilities.

That is admirable.


And if I
were aware that French hams were out of band, I wouldn't be completing
circuits for them nor sending them QSL cards.

It is your right to do so. You may research the band allocations for
each and every DX station you hear, before you actually call them or
respond to them. It will assuredly cut down on the number of contacts
your make, especially in a contest or pileup situation. You should also
bear in mind that nothing in the regulations under which you operate,
mandates that you do so. You are responsible for making sure that your
own signal is where it is supposed to be. If any station I've ever
worked was where he was not supposed to be, he'd likely not be able to
show off a treasured QSL from a rare station which read the exact
frequency of operation (i.e. 50.115 MHz).

Additionally, you can check on the web or by using a callsign database,
to be certain that each domestic station you might contact is where he
or she is supposed to be under the terms of his or her license.

Finally, there is nothing in the regs which makes you responsible for my
station operation either here in the United States, in Tanzania or in
any other country.


indeed you spend a page avoiding the issue

The issue? The issue is waaaaaaay up at the top of the page. To save
you the trouble of going up there to look, it was:


"That's three things offered by you as fact. Please provide any old
evidence at all that what you've claimed, that Jim Miccolis prevented
Len from presenting his views here. A single instance will do."

It was written by me. Brian's diversion took us down the merry path.

I hope that clears things up for you.


very clear

Duuuuuh, not to you. You managed to hose it up.

you are a fraud, and lack the moral courage to deal with an issue

First, have someone define the issue for you. Then have them explain
its nuances. Seek assistance in formulating a reasoned response and get
your pool of typists post it in English for you.

Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:

In article t
Dave Heil wrote:

cut



Your example is one of how you couldn't cut it as a real man.

What do you know of real men, Roger/not Roger?


I know you aren't one of them.

You know? How would you know? You're just some guy hiding behind
anonymous remailers.


which mean what? that he knows nothing?

You know, I hadn't thought of that. I meant that the Roger Wiseman who
is behind these anonymous remailer posts is a non-entity in my life. He
has seen my precisely once in his life. But now that you've mentioned
it, he really is the kind of guy who knows little of anything. Use
Google and look under Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ and KC8JBO.

cut


You can't use your own name lest you have
the police on your doorstep again. You have to be very, very careful.


Really? Doubtful, since they haven't been on my doorstep.

Sure they have, a number of times, and you've been invited to see them
as well.


You know this How?

I learned of it during several visits to Glen Dale, WV Polic Chief
Norman Stenger. Glen Dale Police Officers are quite familiar with Mr.
Wiseman. They had dealings with him before my visits.

And since when does
the police deny freedom of speech?

Since when *do* the police, not *does* the police. Your freedom of
speech stops where my rights begin.


gee you are very concerned about YOUR rights but support the abuse of
other poeple rights

You know not of what you speak.

yep I am beigin to wonder if you are not a cut out for Stevie

A cut out for him? Can you explain the concept?

No wonder you
were relegated to doing errand type tasks for the "State Department."

I've never filled a job position which entailed "errand type tasks".


Oh, so you couldn't even make the errand boy grade?

Why don't you make it your life's work to try to find out?


why should anyone?

Precisely.

such an ego you have

It has nothing to do with my ego.

gee looking more like Stevie

Steve and I look nothing alike.

You monitor local FM repeaters


Good amateur practice says you should monitor before doing anything else. You'd
think an world class DXer who talks to out of banders like you would know that.

You know nothing of my activies on 6m from overseas. By the way, it is
"a world class DXer", not "an world class DXer". Makes little
difference, I've never claimed to be either.


If he and the rest of US know nothing then I guess all of your posts
about them must have been lies

You just jumped to a false conclusion. Folks here know only because
I've seen fit to tell them. The only folks who know for sure are those
who worked me on 6m....and me.

aroogance now the speeling looks a lot like stevie
cut

YOu can tell by the aroogance and speeling, can you? C'mon. You had help.

Hmm is Dave realy Stevie. It could be, but not likely Sadly Stevie's
abusive self centered is all too comon

You're still a twit, Mark.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

cut

More word play.

Word play? Hardly. I've never participated in a State Department net
on RTTY or CW.

More word play. Clintonesque.

I fail to see any word play. I made a factual and concise statement of
the truth.


the very meaning of word play as word play. Nicely done

Further down you just admitted to opening and closing RTTY net using CW
on "another frequency."

Yes, I did. I was not active on any CW or RTTY net. It can't be much
more plain that that.


so you closed a RTTY net that were not on with CW?

Thank you for pointing out my error. I closed a RTTY circuit by use of
CW on another frequency. There was no net involved.

no it seems I have pointed out your lie


the only plain meaning in there would saying you are nuts
cut

That would be the only meaning with which you could come up. Well...

It never began.


You should work on your facts.

The W1AW operator is paid a salary to transmit on amateur frequencies.
School teachers may make radio transmissions as a part of their paid
instructions to students.

Is the W1AW op paid to transmit? Are you certain? School teachers
receive a salary for teaching, not for demonstrating amateur radio.


more word play

If you mean that I used words to respond, then you are correct.

cut


As in "deep-sixed".


As in "murdered?"

If "murdered" is what you want to write, then write it. You aren't
going to twist my words.


no one is trying to twist your words just trying to pin you down to
what you mean

I wrote what I meant in the first place. Brian is trying to get me to
say another thing.

Indeed I think most people have an easier time reading my stuff at its
worst than reading your dreck

I think you may have just written your biggest fabrication of all.

not at all you spend days and day trying to franticaly avoid saying
what you mean

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:
cut
don't think so but you can't tell with the remailers

and unlike you I can polite to anyone, even those that dispise me, if
they can be polite in turn

Polite in return? Seek comfort wherever you can find it, Mark. Check
Google for Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ or KC8JBO to see who you've cozied up to.

Comfort? boyo you need to over yourself

I can be polite to those that are polite to me, making me a better man
than you are, but then Dee Flint is a better man than you are

I've not only not flirted with bisexual woman, I've not flirted with any
woman in any newsgroup. You can lead a dyslexic to Google, but you
can't make him read.


meaning no one my be premitted to form his/her own opinion on anything
without Daves aproval.

That isn't what it means at all, Mark. It means that you can go to an
archived source and still not be able to comprehend what you are looking at.

yes it is what you mean

noon but you are premitted to decide what you are saying


I bet your wife would disagree with your
assement if she read all of your various exachnges with that woman

You'd be completely and utterly wrong...again.

Don't know for sure but I don't think so, could be though


Indeed I also simply can't understand how you can maneg to polite to a
bisexaul female and yet be so moraly repulsed by a bisexual male

You've misread or misunderstood or are deliberately being obtuse. The
woman is not, repeat no bisexual. She is not, repeat not a stripper. At
no time did I flirt with her.

according to women she is Bisexual and I see the length content and
nature of the exchanges between on the NG as flirting

Would you like to see my archived comments from the alt.west-virginia
newsgroup on those who claim to be bisexual? Right he

no I saw them once you were disgusting enough without repeating
yourself
cut
and more of you bashing the disabled

My comments were directed not to the disabled as a group, but to you.
You are a vicious, lying SOB. My apologies to the truly disabled.

more of your lies Dave

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:

cut


More word play.

Word play? Hardly. I've never participated in a State Department net
on RTTY or CW.

More word play. Clintonesque.

I fail to see any word play. I made a factual and concise statement of
the truth.


the very meaning of word play as word play. Nicely done


Further down you just admitted to opening and closing RTTY net using CW
on "another frequency."

Yes, I did. I was not active on any CW or RTTY net. It can't be much
more plain that that.


so you closed a RTTY net that were not on with CW?

Thank you for pointing out my error. I closed a RTTY circuit by use of
CW on another frequency. There was no net involved.


no it seems I have pointed out your lie

I saw the error you pointed out. I admitted the error and corrected it.

the only plain meaning in there would saying you are nuts
cut

That would be the only meaning with which you could come up. Well...


It never began.


You should work on your facts.

The W1AW operator is paid a salary to transmit on amateur frequencies.
School teachers may make radio transmissions as a part of their paid
instructions to students.

Is the W1AW op paid to transmit? Are you certain? School teachers
receive a salary for teaching, not for demonstrating amateur radio.


more word play

If you mean that I used words to respond, then you are correct.


cut



As in "deep-sixed".


As in "murdered?"

If "murdered" is what you want to write, then write it. You aren't
going to twist my words.


no one is trying to twist your words just trying to pin you down to
what you mean

I wrote what I meant in the first place. Brian is trying to get me to
say another thing.


Indeed I think most people have an easier time reading my stuff at its
worst than reading your dreck

I think you may have just written your biggest fabrication of all.


not at all you spend days and day trying to franticaly avoid saying
what you mean

There's part of your problem. I write what I intend to convey. You
attempt to read it and through an inability to comprehend or through
some suspicion on your part that my words have some hidden meaning, you
believe that I'm trying to avoid saying what I mean.

"Paranoia striked deep
into your heart it will creep"
--Buffalo Springfield

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
cut

Fantastic! An endorsement from the World's Greatest DXer. I'll
request that it be known as the "Heil Award," in your honor.

I've seen nothing to indicate an endorsement from the World's Greatest
DXer. Perhaps you received an e-mail from him. While I haven't
endorsed the idea, I have encouraged you to pursue it.


indeed you do always encourage people to feed your ego

You keep showing us that you can't comprehend the written word. I asked
for no credit. The idea is Brian Burke's. I've never claimed to be the
World's Greatest DXer. You've come up with nothing once again, frantic
fabricator.

I understand it fine never said you asked for credit never commented on
your claim

you just don't understand the written word, esp if it says anything you
don't wnat to read


cut


As to learning "ANY diplomacy",


there is never an instance where an ambassador calls a communications
type and says, "We've just received news from Washington. I want you to
go to the Foreign Ministry and make a demarche".


And there you have it.

Yes, there you have it. Ambassadors, Deputy Chiefs of Mission,
Political and Economics Officers make demarches, telephone and write to
foreign ministers, presidents, prime ministers and the like.
Information Management personnel have quite different job requirements.


indeed We may all the god for that...

We may all the god? Just how do we accomplish that?

not my problem


...the fact you were a file clerk was
obviously much better for the nation and the world than puting you in
real diplomatic work

Ah, ah, ah, manic manufacturer of fables! I was never a file clerk.
There are people who file things in embassies. They used to be called
"secretaries" but they're now called "Office Management Specialists".
Then again, those of us who were "Information Management Specialists" as
a broad subgroup, used to be "Support Communications Officers". I liked
the old term. The generic term "Communicators" is used on a daily basis.

and Torturers are called "Pain Technicians" spin it all you like clerk,
but you are convincing no one, not already tkaen in by your bull****



He was merely their messenger.

Perhaps it soothes you to cling to that belief.


In addition to sending messages, what else did you do?

I'm certain that I've outlined it before. In addition to sending
messages, I received messages. :-)


My My such ornerous duties

Only a twit would cut an entire paragraph and then write "My My such
ornerous duties (sic)".

you keep geting it wrong I hadn't cut the paragraph yet

cut
cut
Then there's Heil's thrilling tales of African adventures
where he "synchronized" State Department communications via
morsemanship in the 1980s...

He opened and closed rtty circuits with CW?

He surely did, but not on the same frequency as the RTTY circuit.


What frequency?

A different one!


i see more non answer answerer

An answer was provided. You didn't like it. You have no clearance and
no need to know.

more tom cruise

cut


None of that has anything to do with amateur radio...unless one
counts the entirety of the Department of State as an "amateur"
effort of foreign policy.

Do you think has an anti-U.S. Foreign Policy bias, Brian?


I -could- pretend to not understand your question, but that would be
too heilish.

I think that Len has an anti-Heil bias.

That has been obvious, but I asked about a U.S. Foreign Policy bias. He
has frequently taken pot shots at the U.S. Department of State and U.S.
Foreign Policy.


Indeed and you flame Len for this american tradition of questioning the
action of the natiion, you flame him for prefroming the DUTY of an
amercian citizen
cut
cut


With that degree, you'd likely be able to figure that Bissau and
Freetown are across the continent from Asmara. When my old colleagues
speak of the "West African Echo" they don't include East Africa. Go
figure. I didn't work into nor did I work through Asmara. The missing
piece of the puzzle for both of you is the location of the station I
worked into. Good luck.


Ascension.

I only wish I was at liberty to tell you.


rich the I could tell you bit have to kill routine. Tom cruise does it
better dave
cut

I was doing it before Tom Cruise was old enough to work. The fact is,
there are things which I know that I simply can't share with you. If it
bothers you, I don't care.

Doesn't bother me just disgusts me your efforts to make yourself look
important


I agree. Has Len been insulted? denigrated? belittled?

If there's a God in Heaven, he has.


mighty generous

I'm a mighty generous guy.

As to the FCC staffer schpiel, it has been previously addressed a number
of times. Len isn't an FCC staffer, nor is he a radio amateur.


Nor are most FCC staffers, even the ones dealing directly with amateur
radio.

That's right. They're paid to do a job, whether they participate in
some radio service or not. Len isn't a participant and he isn't a
regulator.


so what?

Check Google. I don't have time to explain it for those who can't keep up.

no need to check google to know that you just can't stand anyone that
doesn't kowtow to you, everyong remotely honest on her knows that

I was just trying to fair nd give a chance t make your point if your
had one

so it was just another gratouitous attack boring


why do you seem to deny the rights of american citizen in amercia?

Len has no right for his views to be accepted. His views carry no more
weight than my own. The terms "America" and "American" are capitalized.
There is no "Amercia".

never len did, but he does have the right to express his opinion a
right you seek to deny him and me for that matter


Heil may have spent too much time in the basement with his radios.

Now *that* would be weird. My hamshack consists of two, adjacent second
floor rooms.


You told us you lived in a tarpaper shack.

There's tarpaper under there somewhere.


ah yess another lie

Let me see if I understand you. You wan't to promote a quarrel over
whether there is tarpaper on my house? Do I have it correct?

no you don't

Dave K8MN