On 6/3/2011 3:23 PM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/3/2011 11:37 AM, John Smith wrote:


...
Think about it. In doing any calculation, aether need
not be entered as a value. In doing any calculation, god
need not be entered as a value. Therefore, they can and
actually MUST be treated exactly as if they do not exist.

Period, dot.

Game over.


I see the point you make.

Akin to saying, "We can ignore time", and sometimes we can ...

And, normally, I would agree ... but, when attempting to discover what
these things really are, or attempting to advance knowledge so we make a
jump to FTL, new energy sources, new universes, etc., I don't.

And, ether becomes of primary importance, or is paramount to discussions
on the subject ... let's just not develop a mental illness where we want
to prevent all others from ignoring-it/discussing-it ...


From discussing WHAT? Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated
EXACTLY as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?

It amounts to mental masturbation.

Personally, I don't jerk-off in public.....Much.




How fitting, it all began with your personal opinions, then filling in
with personal attacks and tomfoolery, now back to personal opinion ...
full circle.

Regards,
JS

On 6/3/2011 9:11 PM, John Smith wrote:


And, ether becomes of primary importance, or is paramount to discussions
on the subject ... let's just not develop a mental illness where we want
to prevent all others from ignoring-it/discussing-it ...


From discussing WHAT? Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated
EXACTLY as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?





How fitting, it all began with your personal opinions, then filling in
with personal attacks and tomfoolery, now back to personal opinion ...
full circle.


My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.






--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On 6/4/2011 1:44 AM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/3/2011 9:11 PM, John Smith wrote:


And, ether becomes of primary importance, or is paramount to
discussions
on the subject ... let's just not develop a mental illness where we
want
to prevent all others from ignoring-it/discussing-it ...


From discussing WHAT? Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated
EXACTLY as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?





How fitting, it all began with your personal opinions, then filling in
with personal attacks and tomfoolery, now back to personal opinion ...
full circle.


My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On 6/4/2011 4:54 AM, John Smith wrote:



My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On 6/4/2011 2:10 AM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/4/2011 4:54 AM, John Smith wrote:



My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?


Yeah, that is about right, Einstein didn't exist either, or was wrong ...

ROFLOL!!!

.... tomfoolery ...

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On 6/4/2011 10:07 AM, John Smith wrote:




My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?


Yeah, that is about right, Einstein didn't exist either, or was wrong ...


How does that statement address my question?









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo