Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Heil" wrote:
Len Over 21 wrote: What is that to you? It effects me because I am an active radio amateur. You, on the other hand, are in no way involved. (snip) (snip) I think you must have me mixed up with you. I'm a radio amateur. You are a bystander. I'm somewhat uncomfortable with that, Dave. As I see it, when discussing a radio service which uses the radio frequencies that belong to all Americans, no American Citizen who wants to be involved is a bystander and all (Amateur and non-Amateur) have a right to be involved in the discussion. Likewise, I saw nothing in rules of this newsgroup which would restrict the participation of non-Amateurs. You may not like what Len has to say, but the lack of a Ham license alone should not diminish it or dismiss it. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |