Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Aug 28, 8:18 am That's nice, Len. Who attempted to silence you? Have you told anyone to shut up or leave the newsgroup? :-) :-) Well, there was the classic "feldwebel post".... And what has Jim's response been to Len's comments? It has been quite varied and quite mild considering Len's typical insulting demeanor. Oh, my! "typical insulting demeanor?" Davie is above such things? Not by all the archives in Google! :-) Yes, Len, your typical insulting demeanor. I think you meant "behavior", Dave. You know, the one which brought about the creation of Jim's apropos profile of your likely actions: N2EY: "Besides, here's a simple, plain fact: No matter what job, educational level, employer, or government/military service that a radio amateur has, if said radio amateur opposes Mr. Anderson's views, he/she will be the target of Mr. Anderson's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic slurs, excessive emoticons and general infantile behavior." Actually there's an updated version: No matter what employment, education, experience or government/military service a person has, if that person opposes Mr. Anderson's views, he/she will be the target of Mr. Anderson's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic/gender/racial slurs, excessive emoticons and general infantile behavior. I've found it to be a very accurate predictor of Len's behavior on rrap. Len of course has parodied/plaigirized and in doing so simply provide more proof of its validity. Note that the profile does not call Len names or other direct insults. It simply predicts his behavior when faced with opposition to his views. Perhaps Len considers such opposition to be the ultimate insult to him. What Jim hasn't done is to prevent or attempt to prevent Len from making those comments. Nor would I. What I have done is to point out errors in Len's reasoning and claims. And I backed it up with google quotes and other info. For example, some time back Len posted that all hams could continue to operate legally with licenses that were in the grace period. I showed that to be in error, by simply quoting the appropriate sections of Part 97. Len's behavior in response to that was typical of the profile. Right now, there's not a damn thing Jimmie can do about it... There's plenty that people "can do about it". No one chooses to. Not worth the time or effort. Slow down and regroup, Len. Jim has done nothing to prevent you from commenting to this newsgroup or to your government. Your rant is vapor. Dave, consider that perhaps Len considers *any* opposition to his views as an attempt to silence him. The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon discrediting Len's comments and opinions. Free speech includes the right to discredit other's comments and opinions if those comments and opinions are not based on facts and sound logical reasoning. Some of Len's comments and opinions are not based on facts and sound logical reasoning. In the end, if they cannot lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s), they claim that his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham. Actually the logic is quite different. It comes down to asking why Len is so interested in amateur radio policy even though Len is not a ham and has never been one. There has been a nocodetest amateur radio license in the USA since 1991, yet Len never got one. The maximum code test required for any US amateur radio license has been 5 wpm since 1990 (with medical waiver) and since 2000 without a waiver. Nor is Len a manufacturer of amateur radio equipment, nor does he have anything to do with FCC. More than 5-1/2 years ago, Len told us he was going for Extra, but didn't say when, and it hasn't happened yet. And regardless of how someone replies to Len's posts here, Len will reply according to the profile. It's just his way. Why should anyone reply to his posts at all, Dave? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: snip So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Indeed it does get tiresome that they go on and on about Could we keep to once a month or once a week (valid I suppose if someone slips in to let them Know) There's something in there that they just won't come out an say. If they do, it will likely be on Aaron Jones "Morse Myths" list. So they get to the very edge of the ledge and peer over, afraid to make the leap. And regardless of how someone replies to Len's posts here, Len will reply according to the profile. It's just his way. Why should anyone reply to his posts at all, Dave? 73 de Jim, N2EY Hi, hi! You reply directly to my comment, then you act as if you are speaking to Dave. Then you ask why anyone should reply to Len's posts at all. More hi, hi's! Jim, when you're ready to have a rational discussion with me, I'll be here. when we have a rational discussion it will likely merely be a front for Procoder effort to assinate us, by shocking us into heart attacks Jim probably sends secret morse code messages the other three Morsemen begging them to reply to my or Len's comments or opinions, so that he can then jump in without looking like he's actually addressing us. Poor thing. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: snip So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Indeed it does get tiresome that they go on and on about Could we keep to once a month or once a week (valid I suppose if someone slips in to let them Know) There's something in there that they just won't come out an say. If they do, it will likely be on Aaron Jones "Morse Myths" list. So they get to the very edge of the ledge and peer over, afraid to make the leap. Indeed they can't be honest to admit that what they want is the power to censor and silence all oposition Did you catch Dan flaming for daring to answer his direct question. Of course I did commit the sin of not answering as he wished cut |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: snip So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Indeed it does get tiresome that they go on and on about Could we keep to once a month or once a week (valid I suppose if someone slips in to let them Know) There's something in there that they just won't come out an say. If they do, it will likely be on Aaron Jones "Morse Myths" list. So they get to the very edge of the ledge and peer over, afraid to make the leap. Indeed they can't be honest to admit that what they want is the power to censor and silence all oposition But the moment they do they know that they will be in league with the dark side. Better for them to just pray for and wish it and not actually do it. Did you catch Dan flaming for daring to answer his direct question. Of course I did commit the sin of not answering as he wished cut Him and Bruce are running buddies, so I can't take much of Dan seriously. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote: wrote: snip So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Indeed it does get tiresome that they go on and on about On and on about? Could we keep to once a month or once a week (valid I suppose if someone slips in to let them Know) Could we? How are you involved? Jim, when you're ready to have a rational discussion with me, I'll be here. when we have a rational discussion it will likely merely be a front for Procoder effort to assinate us, by shocking us into heart attacks I have a sneaking hunch that you've been assinated any number of times. Dave K8MN |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: snip So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Indeed it does get tiresome that they go on and on about On and on about? about the subject of the text now 3 to 6 lines above this Could we keep to once a month or once a week (valid I suppose if someone slips in to let them Know) Could we? How are you involved? I guess you are syaing we can't. I am certainly involved in the NG much to your ..disaproval shale we say Jim, when you're ready to have a rational discussion with me, I'll be here. when we have a rational discussion it will likely merely be a front for Procoder effort to assinate us, by shocking us into heart attacks I have a sneaking hunch that you've been assinated any number of times. Now you are showing your need for meds, serious meds Dave K8MN |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: snip So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Indeed it does get tiresome that they go on and on about On and on about? about the subject of the text now 3 to 6 lines above this Could we keep to once a month or once a week (valid I suppose if someone slips in to let them Know) Could we? How are you involved? I guess you are syaing we can't. I am certainly involved in the NG much to your ..disaproval shale we say Jim, when you're ready to have a rational discussion with me, I'll be here. when we have a rational discussion it will likely merely be a front for Procoder effort to assinate us, by shocking us into heart attacks I have a sneaking hunch that you've been assinated any number of times. Now you are showing your need for meds, serious meds Get someone to read you what you wrote. Dave K8MN |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
K8CPA Email | CB |