Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
William wrote: JJ wrote in message ... Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: But NOT for the types of communications that were supported by Amateur Radio...that's the PURPOSE of Amateur Radio...to relieve those other services of having to worry about that. Lets see if in the next emergency when another service is needed to relieve other services, which the emergency officials call on first for relief, lenny and witless william with their gameboy cell phones, or ham radio. Try as they may to discredit ham radio's usefullness in such times, the military and civil authorities consider ham radio to be viable means of communications in emergencies, but not the cell network. JayJay, I happen to be an amateur. I have equipment. I have been trained. I am available should the need arise. I do not discredit amateur radio's usefulness in such times. Yet you greatly discredit the impact that cellular telephones have made on emergency communications. Because in a major disaster calling for emergency comms, the cell network will be, far all practical purposes, useless. You have only one size of emergency: Huge! That's laughable. The emergency officials will not rely on the cell network for major comms during an emergency. Hint: They will if it is useful for them to do so. Should the network fail, they will resort to other means. In addition to the communication ability of military and civil services, they will rely on Amateur Radio if it is needed, So Amateur Radio isn't their first choice? How sad. and Amateur Radio will be there if needed. Perhaps it will and perhaps it won't. That is the nature of volunteers. And if you're radio volunteers are also committed to numerous other emergency and quasi-emergency relief agencies, and your emergency is Huge, and if the cellular network is down, and if the agency wireless communications fail, Then and only then will you learn if Amatuer Radio was there when needed. If a service is needed to suplement other comms, they will not call on or count on the cell phone network, they will call on Amateur Radio. Because all emergencies are Huge! |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
"William" wrote in message om... JJ wrote in message ... I suggest you tell Average Citizen that he or she needs to have an amateur radio operator strapped to their hip for emergency purposes. Until they buy into your argument in large numbers, cellular telephones will continue to eclipse amateur radio for Average Citizens emergency communications. You make the mistake by considering all emergencies to be equal. They are not. Cell phone is great for communicating when you go off the road in an ice storm. It is useless when all the local cell towers have been taken out by a hurricane. Emergency communications need to be appropriate to the situation. Nothing more and nothing less. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
William wrote:
JJ wrote in message ... William wrote: JJ wrote in message ... William wrote: JJ wrote in message ... William wrote: I would hazard a quess that the average American Citizen DOES know someone with a cell phone. Cell phones are almost ubiquitous, so much so that they are annoyances. 100 million subscriptions, 265 million people. You do the math. And the network becomes useless in an emergency, Stop right there. In every emergency ever, the cell network always becomes useless? As far as millitary and civil authorities are concerned for official emergency comms... a big *yes*. Are you the SECDEF? Are you the Director of FEMA? You paint with a broad brush and without authority. That makes it grafitti. I suggest you call NORAD/NORTHCOM, FEMA, The Red Cross, Civil Defense,and other emergency agencies and ask them how much weight they place on the cell phone system for emergency comms in times of a major disaster. I suggest you tell Average Citizen that he or she needs to have an amateur radio operator strapped to their hip for emergency purposes. Where did I speak of the average citizen? Until they buy into your argument in large numbers, cellular telephones will continue to eclipse amateur radio for Average Citizens emergency communications. So they may, but in times of emergency, the military and other civil authorites will not rely on cell phones to handle major emergency communications. They will rely on Amateur Radio if the need arises and AR can supplement military or other civil emergency comms, but they will not rely on the cell network. |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Witless Willie splutterd again and said:
So Amateur Radio isn't their first choice? How sad. So who said it was? and Amateur Radio will be there if needed. Perhaps it will and perhaps it won't. That is the nature of volunteers. And if you're radio volunteers are also committed to numerous other emergency and quasi-emergency relief agencies, and your emergency is Huge, and if the cellular network is down, and if the agency wireless communications fail, Then and only then will you learn if Amatuer Radio was there when needed. I have never seen the Amateur Radio community fail to responed when needed. If a service is needed to suplement other comms, they will not call on or count on the cell phone network, they will call on Amateur Radio. Because all emergencies are Huge! You said that, I didn't. |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
|
#197
|
|||
|
|||
|
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
emergency. Hint: They will if it is useful for them to do so. Should the network fail, they will resort to other means. The military and civil authorities don't even consider the cell network in there emergency communications plans, they know it is too unreliable, they do consider Amateur Radio. |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com...
"William" wrote in message om... JJ wrote in message ... I suggest you tell Average Citizen that he or she needs to have an amateur radio operator strapped to their hip for emergency purposes. Until they buy into your argument in large numbers, cellular telephones will continue to eclipse amateur radio for Average Citizens emergency communications. You make the mistake by considering all emergencies to be equal. No I don't. They are not. You won the door prize. Cell phone is great for communicating when you go off the road in an ice storm. Actually, cell phones just might suck when you go off the road in an ice storm. It is useless when all the local cell towers have been taken out by a hurricane. Has that ever happened? Name the storm. Emergency communications need to be appropriate to the situation. Ding ding ding. Give that monkey a banana! Nothing more and nothing less. Has ham radio ever NOT gotten through? Did the ham survive that emergency? Even in a total comm blackout, people do survive. |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: emergency. Hint: They will if it is useful for them to do so. Should the network fail, they will resort to other means. The military and civil authorities don't even consider the cell network in there emergency communications plans, they know it is too unreliable, they do consider Amateur Radio. How do the civil and military authorities intend to be initially notified that there is an emergency? Send a runner? I always had to carry a pager. Cellular telephones have mostly replaced pagers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1398  May 28, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | General |