Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
|
#203
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
William wrote: JJ wrote in message ... William wrote: JJ wrote in message ... William wrote: JJ wrote in message ... William wrote: I would hazard a quess that the average American Citizen DOES know someone with a cell phone. Cell phones are almost ubiquitous, so much so that they are annoyances. 100 million subscriptions, 265 million people. You do the math. And the network becomes useless in an emergency, Stop right there. In every emergency ever, the cell network always becomes useless? As far as millitary and civil authorities are concerned for official emergency comms... a big *yes*. Are you the SECDEF? Are you the Director of FEMA? You paint with a broad brush and without authority. That makes it grafitti. I suggest you call NORAD/NORTHCOM, FEMA, The Red Cross, Civil Defense,and other emergency agencies and ask them how much weight they place on the cell phone system for emergency comms in times of a major disaster. I suggest you tell Average Citizen that he or she needs to have an amateur radio operator strapped to their hip for emergency purposes. Where did I speak of the average citizen? That's who I've been speaking of all along. Do try to keep up. Until they buy into your argument in large numbers, cellular telephones will continue to eclipse amateur radio for Average Citizens emergency communications. So they may, but in times of emergency, the military and other civil authorites will not rely on cell phones to handle major emergency communications. And it's always about the military and civil authorities, isn't it? I am no longer an instrument of national policy. Are you? They will rely on Amateur Radio if the need arises and AR can supplement military or other civil emergency comms, but they will not rely on the cell network. They do and will continue to rely upon cellular telephones and pagers for notification. Get used to it. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
William wrote:
And it's always about the military and civil authorities, isn't it? That is who will be handling the major comms during a major emergency, not the AC with a cell phone on his hip. They do and will continue to rely upon cellular telephones and pagers for notification. Get used to it. But they will not rely on cell phones to carry communications during a major emergency, but they may rely on ham radio if needed, get used to it. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
William wrote: And it's always about the military and civil authorities, isn't it? That is who will be handling the major comms during a major emergency, not the AC with a cell phone on his hip. For what purpose are they handling the major comms? They do and will continue to rely upon cellular telephones and pagers for notification. Get used to it. But they will not rely on cell phones to carry communications during a major emergency, but they may rely on ham radio if needed, get used to it. I've been used to that. But there's a new technology on board now. Get used to it. |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service
From: (William) Date: 3/19/2004 6:21 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: JJ wrote in message ... Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: But NOT for the types of communications that were supported by Amateur Radio...that's the PURPOSE of Amateur Radio...to relieve those other services of having to worry about that. Lets see if in the next emergency when another service is needed to relieve other services, which the emergency officials call on first for relief, lenny and witless william with their gameboy cell phones, or ham radio. Try as they may to discredit ham radio's usefullness in such times, the military and civil authorities consider ham radio to be viable means of communications in emergencies, but not the cell network. JayJay, I happen to be an amateur. I have equipment. I have been trained. You are licensed. The FCC says so. You may have equipment. Anyone can buy it. From the nature of the posts you have made ehre, I doubt that any training you have had has been anything anyone would call "adequate". I am available should the need arise. I will go to bed comforted tonight knowing you're out there, Brain. I do not discredit amateur radio's usefulness in such times. That is not the truth. You've made grossly disparaging remarks in this forum on several occassions. Yet you greatly discredit the impact that cellular telephones have made on emergency communications. The point remains: The "emergency agencies" continue to make plans for the use of Amateur Radio to help provide communication needs in the advent of loss of regular telephony services...Not to use telephony if Amateur Radio fails. Steve, K4YZ |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service
From: JJ Date: 3/19/2004 7:31 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: William wrote: Yet you greatly discredit the impact that cellular telephones have made on emergency communications. Because in a major disaster calling for emergency comms, the cell network will be, far all practical purposes, useless. The emergency officials will not rely on the cell network for major comms during an emergency. In addition to the communication ability of military and civil services, they will rely on Amateur Radio if it is needed, and Amateur Radio will be there if needed. If a service is needed to suplement other comms, they will not call on or count on the cell phone network, they will call on Amateur Radio. I just spent my weekend sitting in the TEMA/FEMA EOC in Nashville All I can say is...WHEW! I know Brainless and Lennie will discount any likelyhood of my objectivity, however I was impressed with TEMA's communications facilities. Yes, the FEMA folks each carry a cellphone with them. There are NO seperate cellphone facilities in the EOC, however. The EOC has the capability of accessing any frequency from 1.8MHz to 2GHz in a plethora of modes, secure and unsecure, to include military if necessary. Many commercial assets can be accessed if required. Off-site remotes are situated with almost all of the same capabilites in case of an attack or other loss of use of the prime EOC. There is a dedicated Amateur Radio packet station, HF station, two V/UHF operating positions and third UHF position dedicated to the MTEARS net (Middle Tennessee Emergency Amateur Radio Service) which is directly tied to NOAA and carries the bulk of SKYWARN traffic in western and middle Tennessee. Thier own HF facilites include operating positions for SHARES, FEMA's own nets, A dedicated position for CAP (Civil Air Patrol) is being added to "the pit". Communications assets for CAP will eventually include HF, VHF, air-to-ground, and a digital imaging site for the HSI (Hyper Spectral Imaging) package CAP aircraft are being equipped with, as well as VHF slow scan video. With the exception of two "cordless" telephones, a handful of TV remotes, and three ISR (Intra Squad Radios, the federal version of FRS) HT's used to talk to the guard shack and garage, there are NO "unlicensed" devices on the facility. (The only "major" role the ISR radios might play is if they are used by a commissioned O-4 in the Armed Forces.) Speaking of "TV remotes", this place would put a lot of those "every channel of sports" sports bars to shame! They even had channels dedicated to foreign news services running. When I asked about "CB" radio or "GMRS", I was told that there were no plans to use either, that there was not even a usable GMRS repeater in the area. Any REACT group that presented itself would be "tasked under the ARES EC, however we would not allow anyone coming here on the heels of something major to try an wiggle in to an existing plan. We've pretty well got our plans in place, and there's NO plan for CB radio. The gentleman that I spent most of these two days with is a member of the board of APCO, or Association of Public-safety Communications Officials, so I think I can reasonably assume him to be a bit more knowledgeable than certain posters in this forum on the subject of "emergency comms"... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service
From: (William) Date: 3/20/2004 7:06 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Because all emergencies are Huge! They are if they are happening to you. Steve, K4YZ |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service
From: (Len Over 21) Date: 3/20/2004 4:59 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Because in a major disaster calling for emergency comms, the cell network will be, far all practical purposes, useless. You have only one size of emergency: Huge! That's laughable. It may be all he has that is huge... Ahhhhh, yes...Lennie fires an opening volley of "personal perjorative", the nature of which had certain underlying innuendo that he-himself has decried others using in numerous past posts. In addition to the communication ability of military and civil services, they will rely on Amateur Radio if it is needed, So Amateur Radio isn't their first choice? How sad. Tsk, tsk, tsk...another Legend of the Airwaves down in flames. It wasn't a legend to start with. The "legend" status was bestowed by you. The rest is archived history. Obviously one that is sufficiently true enough for CURRENT emergency planners to continue to rely upon. Steve, K4YZ |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service
From: (William) Date: 3/21/2004 7:14 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I suggest you tell Average Citizen that he or she needs to have an amateur radio operator strapped to their hip for emergency purposes. Where did I speak of the average citizen? That's who I've been speaking of all along. Do try to keep up. JJ...please take CAREEFUL note. YOU were talking about disaster preparedness, those sets of plans in place by your local or state EMA, FEMA, etc. And in the overall scheme of things, you (and I) are correct. Brain, on the other hand, having been UNABLE to successfully argue against the value of Amateur Radio in those plans, has shifted his definition of "emergency comms" to those of STRICTLY "the average citizen". In the very narrow slice of "emergency comms" that Brian the Brainless has wedged himself into, yes, John Q Public is going to whip out the old cellphone and call 9-1-1 to get a cop, report a fire, or request EMS for an accident or medical emergency...Just like he would have dialed a payphone 5 years ago. In a true "disaster preparedness" mode, cellphones may suffer all of the bad things that you and I have said they will. THAT assertion is made upon the evidence that such incidents have ALREADY HAPPENED, and those occurences have been sufficient to impress the REAL "emergency comms" planners to continue to incorporate Amateur Radio in a wide range of plans. This is not "urban legend" or based upon some " feel good news release of the ARRL" as Lennie the Loser would have us believe. Real, front-page news stuff. Sorry he won't admit it, but that only helps to substantiate MY claims about his "superior intellect". So they may, but in times of emergency, the military and other civil authorites will not rely on cell phones to handle major emergency communications. And it's always about the military and civil authorities, isn't it? Uhhhhhhh....Brain....Other than "military" or "civilian", what other categories are there? I am no longer an instrument of national policy. Are you? As long as my Right to Vote has not been revoked, you're danged tooting I am! Try again, blockhead. Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|